Teams

Holmberg - HoCo Noon Ballers

2024 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesLukas Sanidas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAti Ok vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Der - AvengersWon 21
W#1 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Henry Cha6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLukas Sanidas vs Sean Der4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesErik Tammaru vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-28vs Der - AvengersWon 20
W#1 SinglesNEERAV GANJOO vs Sean Der6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesErik Tammaru vs Henry Cha6-0, 6-1
2024-10-26vs Ngo - KGWon 10
W#1 SinglesNEERAV GANJOO vs Janardhan Devireddy6-1, 6-3
2024-10-22vs Der - AvengersWon 20
W#1 SinglesNEERAV GANJOO vs Henry McVeigh6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Gregory Selby6-0, 6-4
2024-10-21vs Ngo - KGLost 12
W#1 SinglesErik Tammaru vs Janardhan Devireddy7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJay Yee vs Rual Cung1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAti Ok vs Chris Miller6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-14vs Ngo - KGWon 20
W#1 SinglesLukas Sanidas vs Michael Vaughan6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJay Yee vs Alexander Gerson7-6, 6-4
2024-10-08vs Der - AvengersLost 01
L#2 SinglesJay Yee vs Gregory Selby3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-06vs Ngo - KGWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Nhat Ngo6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAti Ok vs Dat Doan6-4, 6-4
2024-09-18vs Ngo - KGSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Dat Doan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAti Ok vs Rual Cung1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
NEERAV GANJOO
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Roderick Peyton
published 4.5
4.32
Erik Tammaru
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Johan Holmberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Jay Yee
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Luis Esposito
published
4.04
Ati Ok
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Matt Galosky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lukas Sanidas + Erik Tammaru5549% gamesnot enough data
NEERAV GANJOO + Lukas Sanidas404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
NEERAV GANJOO
81W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
4.60
4.5
Roderick Peyton
53W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Erik Tammaru
44W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Johan Holmberg
128W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Jay Yee
134W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
Luis Esposito
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Ati Ok
58W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.04
Matt Galosky
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.