Teams

DED:Dedham:Guermazi/Schramm

2023 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-27vs LFW:Wayland:Cunnigham/KremlLost 13
W#1 DoublesLaura Balter / Lindsay Ebbert vs Simona Kylberger / Sona Schuermann6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLisa Evans vs Irina Lidforss1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMariela Zirlinger / Katya Salkever vs Jennifer Cunningham / Robin Malouf2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Weiss / Lyn Schwartz vs Meghan Swenson / Adele Pascale3-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs COH:Cohasset:Drago/MurphyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Balter / Lindsay Ebbert vs Carolyn Mahoney / Elaine Cosseboom4-6, 3-5
L#1 SinglesLisa Evans vs Elizabeth Lamberti6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Weiss / Nicole Luxembourg vs Jennifer Pascucci / Giovanna LoCicero5-7, 4-6
2023-06-07vs LFW:Wayland:Cunnigham/KremlLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Balter / Lindsay Ebbert vs Aleta Cebere / Carolynn Crabtree0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Resnic / Mariela Zirlinger vs CariAnne Kreml / Sarah Wallach1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSeton Spagnuolo / Lisa Evans vs Alison Garcia Wilson / Meghan Swenson3-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs COH:Cohasset:Drago/MurphyLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rowe / Deirdre Julian vs Anastasia Rozanitis / Alison Albers0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Resnic / Mariela Zirlinger vs Elaine Cosseboom / Elizabeth Campbell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Morton / Seton Spagnuolo vs Elizabeth Murphy / Jennifer Pascucci0-6, 3-6
2023-05-16vs LFW:Wayland:Cunnigham/KremlLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Ebbert / Laura Balter vs Sona Schuermann / Simona Kylberger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Weiss / Deirdre Julian vs Robin Malouf / Jennifer Cunningham4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatya Salkever / Noura Guermazi vs Victoria Scott / Sarah Wallach4-6, 2-6
2023-05-09vs COH:Cohasset:Drago/MurphyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKerry Morton / Mariela Zirlinger vs Anastasia Rozanitis / Carolyn Mahoney1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordana Alford / Noura Guermazi vs Elizabeth Murphy / Giovanna LoCicero4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTina Xia / Talia Ossowski vs Ingrid Drago / Elizabeth Campbell1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COH:Cohasset:Drago/Murphy0617717161
2LFW:Wayland:Cunnigham/Kreml0617718164
3DED:Dedham:Guermazi/Schramm0622245274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Lindsay Ebbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Ann Wolf
published 4.5
Deirdre Julian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Stephanie Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Karen Schramm
published
3.93
Seton Spagnuolo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Weiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Tina Xia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Kerry Morton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Resnic
published
Katya Salkever
published
Laura Balter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Evans
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lyn Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mariela Zirlinger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Luxembourg
published
Noura Guermazi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Talia Ossowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Ebbert + Laura Balter8358% games+1.0% vs expected
Stephanie Rowe + Deirdre Julian044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Resnic + Laura Balter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Lindsay Ebbert
49W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.41
4.5
Ann Wolf
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Deirdre Julian
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Rowe
1W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.06
Karen Schramm
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Seton Spagnuolo
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.93
4
Debra Weiss
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Xia
27W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Kerry Morton
28W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Karen Resnic
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katya Salkever
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Balter
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Evans
9W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lyn Schwartz
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mariela Zirlinger
31W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Luxembourg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Noura Guermazi
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Talia Ossowski
29W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.