Teams

DTC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs GPTC GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesKara Bonanno / Katie Oppliger vs Hilaria Davis / Molly Shinners4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Kaye Johnson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa OConnor / Renae Kyle vs Katherine Barston / Cristina Cook4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Connor vs Valentina Gomez Madani4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJanice Jensen / Elaine Yang vs Marianne Moser / Gabrielle Mattioda2-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs CACM PINKWon 41
W#1 DoublesSharol Preisser / Carrie Weingart vs Kailey Dellenbach / Alecxis Naviaux7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Oppliger vs Lina Reznicek-Parrado6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa OConnor / Kimberly Gillock vs Julie Boes / Lissa Moon6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRenae Kyle vs Jena Dupont6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Ashmore-Guin / Chelsea Sump vs Courtney Kiefer / Mary Beth Church6-4, 6-0
2026-05-19vs CP NAVYWon 41
L#1 DoublesLaura James / Janice Jensen vs Gabrielle Helfgott / Anna Hubbard7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarrie Weingart vs Sara Berner6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKimberly Gillock / Katie Oppliger vs Amy Coyner / Rachel Morley6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKelly Connor vs Kim Chen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRenae Kyle / Elaine Yang vs Sue Hickey / Jennifer Swartwout6-4, 7-5
2026-05-12vs DCC TEALWon 50
W#1 DoublesKara Bonanno / Katie Oppliger vs Robyn Larkin / Layne Voorhees6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCarrie Weingart vs Lauren Harrington6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura James / Janice Jensen vs Allison Craig / Riisa Dikeou6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKelly Connor vs Lindsay Filsinger6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Gillock / Renae Kyle vs Amy Gentile / Sally Obregon7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-28vs CACM REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesLisa OConnor / Renae Kyle vs Kara Boulanger / Angie Sanders6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Connor vs Elizabeth Kirkpatrick2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Ashmore-Guin / Chelsea Sump vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKatie Oppliger vs Kit Demko6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanice Jensen / Lucy Cassidy vs Tiffany Cruikshank / Kylee Glaser0-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs WP YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesKatie Oppliger / Sharol Preisser vs Marina Sterngold / Megan Gunden3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCarrie Weingart vs Michela Zafferani6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Jensen / Laura James vs Lynn Pearson / Olivia Poon6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKelly Connor vs Jenny Jessup0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLisa OConnor / Lucy Cassidy vs Laura Wasserman / Rachel Williams7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-21vs CM GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesKara Bonanno / Katie Oppliger vs Amy Newman / Mindy Franks7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJanice Jensen vs Kai Peters4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharol Preisser / Robin Ashmore-Guin vs Krista Speicher / Kathleen Heerdt6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Connor vs Kristen Robbins6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLucy Cassidy / Chelsea Sump vs Brooke O'Drobinak / Heather Froehlich-Olmsted6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Katie Oppliger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.94
Carrie Weingart
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Kara Bonanno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Kelly Connor
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.87
Kimberly Gillock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Lisa OConnor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Renae Kyle
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Janice Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Sharol Preisser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chelsea Sump
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Laura James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Robin Ashmore-Guin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Lucy Cassidy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Elaine Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Ringelman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Oppliger + Carrie Weingart7082% games+23.9% vs expected
Laura James + Janice Jensen3261% games+20.3% vs expected
Katie Oppliger + Kara Bonanno4256% games+11.0% vs expected
Sharol Preisser + Carrie Weingart21858% games−5.0% vs expected
Kimberly Gillock + Lisa OConnor303 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Cassidy + Chelsea Sump123 matchesnot enough data
Renae Kyle + Lisa OConnor213 matchesnot enough data
Sharol Preisser + Lisa OConnor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katie Oppliger
69W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Carrie Weingart
80W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Kara Bonanno
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Kelly Connor
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Kimberly Gillock
65W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Lisa OConnor
25W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Renae Kyle
8W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Janice Jensen
25W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Sharol Preisser
72W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Chelsea Sump
34W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Laura James
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Robin Ashmore-Guin
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Lucy Cassidy
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Elaine Yang
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Heather Ringelman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.