Teams

Team 1 Haven Aces

2025 NOVA Tri-Level · NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-13vs Team 2 Love&Learn TennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesCornelia Turyn / Laura Riesenberg vs Pamela Stein / Kelly King5-7, 3-4
2025-08-27vs Team 10 Tri Shots 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Katharine Kastens vs Phyllis Corley / Amy Kemon6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-22vs Team 4 Tri and Stop UsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lucas / Jenifer Heilig vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio / Nicole Dougherty5-7, 1-2
2025-07-28vs Team 10 Tri Shots 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJenifer Heilig / Laura Riesenberg vs Nicole Cook / Sarah Konya6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Erin Jacob
published
3.23
Katharine Kastens
published
3.21
Anna McLean
published 3.5
3.05
Jenifer Heilig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Cornelia Turyn
published 3
2.90
Stephanie Dolan
published
2.84
Pam Murphy
published
2.77
Jennifer Lucas
published
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Alexandra Hellmuth
published 2.5
2.52
Susan Foster
published
2.51
Rebecca Sandler
published
Gibson McMahon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Riesenberg + Jenifer Heilig404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Jacob
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Katharine Kastens
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Anna McLean
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Jenifer Heilig
37W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Cornelia Turyn
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Stephanie Dolan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Pam Murphy
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Jennifer Lucas
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Laura Riesenberg
87W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Alexandra Hellmuth
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Susan Foster
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Rebecca Sandler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Gibson McMahon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.