Teams

NHerland (Raintree)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-06vs RCummings (Carmel CC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJon Luther / David Hickson vs Thomas Coleman / Jonas Tanenbaum6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Sinsheimer / Ty Leonard vs Gene Lowe / Rick Welsh7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Hall / Chris Ackerlund vs Robert Cummings / Peter Banks6-4, 6-1
2025-04-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesChris Ackerlund / Michael Fresina vs Donald Wright / Joe Glass3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesChris Ackerlund / Vincent Fitzgerald vs Sandy Needham / Michael Schaus2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJon Luther / David Hickson vs Phillip Davis / Gates Gravely2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNorman Herland / Michael Hall vs Ian Clarke / Peter Hildner3-6, 4-6
2025-03-04vs GQuattlebaum (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Fresina / Ty Leonard vs Eric Jenkins / Robert Salvucci3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
David Balas
published 3.5
3.22
Philip Solomon
published
3.16
Michael Fresina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Ty Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Chris Ackerlund
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
David Hickson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Jon Luther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Sinsheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Norman Herland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vincent Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Luther + David Hickson123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Fresina + Philip Solomon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Balas
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Philip Solomon
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Michael Fresina
39W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Ty Leonard
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Chris Ackerlund
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
David Hickson
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jon Luther
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Michael Sinsheimer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Norman Herland
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Fitzgerald
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.