Teams

Manlius YMCA

2026 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-27vs Nelligan/ GearyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Kellish / Marcus J Brooks vs Kyle Voyer / Fatma Sonmez-Leopold7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Elliott / Prashant Kaul vs Donna Hack / Richard Ingraham2-6, 4-6
2026-02-21vs Krueger-SchiffrikWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Clarke / Lawrence Martin vs Steve Brandt / Anne Brandt6-2, 6-2
2026-02-14vs Net PlaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLawrence Martin / Ping Deng vs Amanda Spottek / Leo O'Connor7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeidi Howard / Wei Lee vs TJ Ciaravino / Ali Krowiak1-6, 4-6
2026-01-24vs Nelligan/ GearyLost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Hotaling / John Bowser vs Donna Hack / Richard Ingraham3-6, 0-6
2026-01-17vs Krueger-SchiffrikWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Elliott / Prashant Kaul vs Bruce Abend / Natalya Levin6-0, 6-2
2026-01-10vs Net PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Clarke / Lawrence Martin vs Erica Haray / Matthew Lange6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Brendan Reagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Lawrence Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Marcus J Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Fenghua Li
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Michele Kellish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Wei Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Heidi Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Doreen Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Kurt Concilla
published
3.26
Prashant Kaul
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Andrea Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Veronica Hotaling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
James Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.91
Valerie Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Ping Deng
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Bowser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Clarke + Lawrence Martin4260% games+8.3% vs expected
Ping Deng + Fenghua Li4649% games−5.3% vs expected
Veronica Hotaling + James Burgess3260% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Elliott + Prashant Kaul224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Elliott + Lawrence Martin224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Elliott + James Burgess303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Reagan
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
Lawrence Martin
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Marcus J Brooks
28W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Fenghua Li
63W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.48
Michele Kellish
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Wei Lee
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Doreen Kingsley
70W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Kurt Concilla
26W–36L career · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.28
Prashant Kaul
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Elliott
73W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3
James Burgess
44W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
Valerie Clarke
71W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Ping Deng
36W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
John Bowser
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.