Teams

GOG HILTON

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-18vs LTFCS MARTINLost 01
L#2 DoublesReagan Simons / Mark Hutter vs Lindsey Conley / Noah Elliott1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-11vs LTFCS WALKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesReagan Simons / Frank Coyle vs Harold Woods / Kira Woods6-4, 6-4
2025-05-04vs MEMPK RAMIREZWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Reagan Simons vs Patrick Ramirez / Effie Jia6-1, 6-3
2025-04-20vs LTFCS WALKERWon 10
W#2 DoublesSean Daniel / Reagan Simons vs Michael Blevin / Lori Kiser3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-16vs MEMPK RAMIREZWon 10
W#2 DoublesReagan Simons / Mark Hutter vs Patrick Ramirez / Kristin Petty6-2, 6-2
2025-04-06vs LTFCS MARTINWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Reagan Simons vs Noah Elliott / Ankie Richard6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Candace Vering
published 5
4.43
Sean Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
John Buerschen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Frank Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Reagan Simons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Jessica Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Ian Irmischer
published 4.5
3.84
Karen Ross
published
Mark Hutter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Kiser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Hutter + Jessica Hilton7158% games+5.2% vs expected
Karen Ross + Sean Daniel3253% games−0.4% vs expected
Matthew Kiser + Jessica Hilton2645% gamesnot enough data
Frank Coyle + Karen Ross6073% gamesnot enough data
Reagan Simons + John Buerschen224 matchesnot enough data
Sean Daniel + Jessica Hilton314 matchesnot enough data
Candace Vering + Sean Daniel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Candace Vering
23W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.75
Sean Daniel
63W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
John Buerschen
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Frank Coyle
73W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Reagan Simons
20W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Jessica Hilton
99W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Ian Irmischer
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.11
Karen Ross
54W–42L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.84
Mark Hutter
48W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Kiser
36W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.