Teams

Long Shots

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-04vs 6.0 Qualifying TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Bean / Ginni McHugh vs Dawn Schwartz / Becky Wilcox6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmma Mather / Patrisha Crisp vs Mardi Robers / Cynthia Ford6-3, 6-3
2026-08-03vs 6.0 Qualifying TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesDelis Olsen / Sheila Schaub vs Mardi Robers / Becky Wilcox4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatrisha Crisp / Jan Schweitzer vs Dawn Schwartz / Holly Thompson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-28vs 6.0 Qualifying TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesJan Schweitzer / Juli McLain vs Cynthia Ford / Mardi Robers6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBlair Davison / Ginni McHugh vs Becky Wilcox / Dawn Schwartz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmma Mather / Patrisha Crisp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-23vs 6.0 Qualifying TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrisha Crisp / Emma Mather vs Mardi Robers / Becky Wilcox4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDelis Olsen / Sheila Schaub vs Holly Thompson / Cynthia Ford6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Long Shots3193764

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emma Mather
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Blair Davison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ginni McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Delis Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Patrisha Crisp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jan Schweitzer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Juli McLain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Bean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Schaub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Bean + Ginni McHugh224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bean + Patrisha Crisp123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bean + Juli McLain123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emma Mather
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Blair Davison
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Ginni McHugh
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Delis Olsen
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Patrisha Crisp
14W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Jan Schweitzer
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juli McLain
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Bean
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sheila Schaub
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.