Teams

LRHE-Herrmann/Trump

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 7.5 Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs LSPO-Porter/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoakim Diedrichs / Brandon Sheets vs Christopher Gillman / Hayden Tuttle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesRon Herrmann / Joakim Diedrichs vs Christian Lackner / Mike Archer6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBrandon Sheets / Joakim Diedrichs vs Chris Wixom / Alfu Miah6-3, 6-3
2024-09-10vs LVSA-Sampoornam/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesWayne Seay / Joakim Diedrichs vs Dushyant Balasubramani / Hyo Rhee6-1, 6-1
2024-09-03vs LGSI-Simonetti/Bain/WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesWayne Seay / Joakim Diedrichs vs Adam Labar / Shawn Dagley6-4, 7-6
2024-08-27vs LJLA-Lands/CSD 40+ 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRon Herrmann / Joakim Diedrichs vs Karthik Shanmugam / Joaquin Pradas6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThomas Koenig / John Igharas vs Jason Lands / Todd Krieg6-3, 6-0
2024-08-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Igharas / Brent Brower vs Ben Ward / Andrew Gosling5-7, 3-6
2024-08-13vs LSSR-Sree/NMP/75Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRon Herrmann / Joakim Diedrichs vs Ragu Gopalan / Marcus Phillips6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Joakim Diedrichs
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.83
John Igharas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Brandon Sheets
published 4
3.77
Murat Akdamar
published
3.64
Wayne Seay
published
3.56
Jeremy Harrison
published
3.51
Forde Aley
published
Brent Brower
published 3.5
Thomas Koenig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Sheets + Joakim Diedrichs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joakim Diedrichs
54W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
John Igharas
59W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Brandon Sheets
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Murat Akdamar
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Wayne Seay
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jeremy Harrison
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.56
Forde Aley
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Brent Brower
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Koenig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.