Teams

Bernhardt/Phillips

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Nathan Bernhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Claude Bosworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joshua Husbands
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2023-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Bernhardt / Claude Bosworth vs Norman Langston / Jim Mounts6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Phillips / Joshua Husbands vs Charles Leavitt / Tom Huminski6-0, 6-0
2023-07-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNathan Bernhardt / Claude Bosworth vs James Jaeger / Joseph Siri6-3, 7-6
2023-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaude Bosworth / Joshua Husbands vs Brian Chapler / Steve Elmer6-3, 6-2
2023-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Phillips / Nathan Ayotte vs Ricardo Ascazubi / Patrick Koeberl6-0, 6-0
2023-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Bernhardt / Claude Bosworth vs Tom Huminski / Charles Leavitt6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Nathan Bernhardt
42W–38L career
0%94%6%
2.91
3
Claude Bosworth
38W–71L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
John Phillips
17W–13L career
not enough data
3
Joshua Husbands
33W–36L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.