Teams

Summit YMCA - Johnson/Hicks

2023 SCTA Spring '23 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women · Weekday Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Weekday Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lauren Terranova
published
3.54
Kathleene Lollis
published
3.50
Carrie Ann Johanson
published 3.5
3.49
Tori Yearta
published
3.41
Lindsay Hepler
published
3.41
Jacqueline Hawkins
published
3.40
Dawn Connally
published 3.5
3.29
Janelle Shively
published
3.22
Kerri Edwards
published
3.17
Cindy Hicks
published 3.5
3.05
Shannon Kirk
published
2.87
LANEY CARDWELL
published
2.85
Amie Craddock
published 3
Amanda Moberly
published 3
Mindy Benefield
published
Mindy Leech
published
Sharon Deason
published
Tyson Cannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Yearta + Lauren Terranova4262% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Benefield + Sharon Deason1443% gamesnot enough data
Kathleene Lollis + Carrie Ann Johanson4159% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Edwards + Carrie Ann Johanson404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hicks + Kathleene Lollis224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Amie Craddock213 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Edwards + Janelle Shively123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hicks + Carrie Ann Johanson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Terranova
24W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.72
Kathleene Lollis
28W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Carrie Ann Johanson
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Tori Yearta
34W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Lindsay Hepler
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jacqueline Hawkins
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Dawn Connally
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janelle Shively
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Kerri Edwards
42W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Hicks
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Shannon Kirk
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
LANEY CARDWELL
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Amie Craddock
18W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Amanda Moberly
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mindy Benefield
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mindy Leech
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Deason
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyson Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.