Teams

Craft - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-14vs Anderson - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Craft / James Davis vs Clay Anderson / Nick Farkas6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJack Ettelson / Chase Dupuis vs Tyler Gross / Jeffrey Henderson0-6, 1-6
2024-12-08vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarshall LaMoyne / Arturo Ramirez vs James Richardson / Douglas Lurton7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Craft / James Davis vs Nick Farkas / Clay Anderson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChase Dupuis / Campbell Esquerre vs Steven Bingert / Matthew O'Neill4-6, 4-6
2024-11-26vs Escambia/Sitton/18&Over7.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesColton Wilson / Chase Dupuis vs Jason Struck / Alex Leonard6-3, 7-6
2024-10-30vs Duncan - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesColton Wilson / James Craft vs Christopher Zuber / ELBERT WOMBLE6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-29vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarshall LaMoyne / Arturo Ramirez vs Christopher Zuber / Michael Peaden6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNick Kitchel / Anthony Giberman vs Tyler Gross / Douglas Lurton6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Craft / James Davis vs JOHNNY DICKSON / Jeffrey Henderson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Nick Kitchel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Marshall LaMoyne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
James Craft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Chase Dupuis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Anthony Giberman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Arturo Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
James Davis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Campbell Esquerre
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jack Ettelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Ettelson + James Craft303 matchesnot enough data
James Craft + James Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Kitchel
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.56
Marshall LaMoyne
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
James Craft
19W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Chase Dupuis
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Anthony Giberman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Arturo Ramirez
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Davis
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Campbell Esquerre
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Jack Ettelson
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.