Teams

RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX9.0

22 players · average NTRP 4.45 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Jennifer Azevedo
published
4.54
Henry Hagenbuch
published 4.5
4.45
Emily Parento
published 4.5
4.45
Michael Damiani
published
4.34
Jennifer Slippy
published
4.30
Erin Chamberlin
published 4.5
4.28
Alison St Sure
published 4.5
4.28
Dan Oppenheim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Erik Sunden
published 4.5
Anna Varnay-Truong
published 4.5
4.08
Kelly Sperry
published
4.03
Angela Downs
published 4.5
3.96
Nick Notti
published
3.89
Leigh Pagan
published
3.88
Elizabeth Notti
published 4.5
3.83
Thomas Schmidt
published
3.76
Tommy Hellyer
published
3.73
Tripp Smith
published
3.68
Molly Neal
published
3.66
Eileen Benson
published 4
3.55
William Chamberlin
published
Mike Downs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Oppenheim + Leigh Pagan213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Downs + Angela Downs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Azevedo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
4.65
4.5
Henry Hagenbuch
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.54
4.5
Emily Parento
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
Michael Damiani
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
Jennifer Slippy
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
4.34
4.5
Erin Chamberlin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Alison St Sure
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Dan Oppenheim
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Erik Sunden
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Anna Varnay-Truong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Sperry
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Angela Downs
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Nick Notti
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Leigh Pagan
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.89
4.5
Elizabeth Notti
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.88
Thomas Schmidt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.83
Tommy Hellyer
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Tripp Smith
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Molly Neal
22W–9L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68
4
Eileen Benson
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
William Chamberlin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Mike Downs
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.