Teams

Shapland, Suzanne

2026 HOA Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-20vs HOA/Blue-Billington/18&over3.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Connell / Lisa Thompson vs Katie Zoldak / Betsy Norberg7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristie Ross vs Shaina Billington6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Root / Susan Geick vs Bree Ginden / Samantha Egbert1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesNancy MacK vs Cory Blue4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTina Kempf / Cheryl Vaught vs Danielle Mau / Sandy Shino2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-13vs Pattabiraman, KarthickLost 14
L#1 DoublesSonia Crim / Elaine Schulze vs Amy Holewinski / Leigh Rode3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Ross vs Svetlana Dorroh6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy MacK / Nancy Connell vs Lauren Nibberich / Lynn Carlton1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDeborah Castaner vs Sadie Putnam3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTina Kempf / Susan Geick vs Laura Bong / Annie Taylor5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Caroline Tougas
published 3.5
3.42
Mary Thornton
published
3.41
Christie Ross
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Nancy Connell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Tina Kempf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tricia Boushka
published
3.27
Suzanne Shapland
published
3.27
Andrea Root
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Geick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Elaine Schulze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Sonia Crim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Maria Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Deborah Castaner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Cheryl Vaught
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Susan Schatz
published
3.10
Nancy MacK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.98
Yunxia Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Shapland + Tricia Boushka2650% games+3.5% vs expected
Andrea Root + Tricia Boushka3351% games−0.0% vs expected
Susan Geick + Tricia Boushka4550% games−0.5% vs expected
Suzanne Shapland + Cheryl Vaught2446% games−2.1% vs expected
Suzanne Shapland + Susan Geick121444% games−2.4% vs expected
Maria Moore + Mary Thornton4547% games−3.9% vs expected
Sonia Crim + Elaine Schulze4452% games−4.4% vs expected
Andrea Root + Mary Thornton13951% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Tougas
20W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mary Thornton
81W–101L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Christie Ross
40W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Nancy Connell
40W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
Tina Kempf
25W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Tricia Boushka
52W–84L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
Suzanne Shapland
61W–93L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Root
93W–120L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Susan Geick
88W–115L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elaine Schulze
58W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Sonia Crim
56W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Maria Moore
63W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deborah Castaner
61W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cheryl Vaught
29W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Susan Schatz
50W–77L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
Nancy MacK
41W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Yunxia Wang
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.