Teams

CP YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs GAC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Shepard / William Lindsay vs Henry Carson / Brandon Paxton1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlan Caffey vs Michael Mauro6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Olson / Michael McAuliffe vs Jeremy Erdley / David Hipshman6-2, 6-1
2026-08-12vs GTC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael McAuliffe / Bradley Congdon vs Suresh Gevaran / Roger Montoya4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Lindsay vs Nikolai Voitsekhovitch4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Shepard / Chad Ahrensdorf vs David Baker / Bruce Silver7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-08vs CACM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Lindsay / Robert Shepard vs Adam Ferry / Chris Donald6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBradley Congdon vs Jonathan Malinzak6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Henkelmann / Michael McAuliffe vs Jonathan Bach / Jeff Kinzler7-6, 6-2
2026-08-05vs CP BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Henkelmann / Robert Shepard vs David Capra / Stephen Rozman7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBradley Congdon vs Michael Whitman1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael McAuliffe / Jordan Olson vs Tally Lawing / Casper Lundemann3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-29vs WP-G REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Henkelmann / William Lindsay vs Ryan MacDowell / Hoang Dinh4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlan Caffey vs Max Volino5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChad Ahrensdorf / Robert Shepard vs Tyler Hagnauer / Tim Fitz6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Bradley Congdon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Michael McAuliffe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Robert Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
William Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.56
Jordan Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Alan Caffey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Paul Henkelmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chad Ahrensdorf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Olson + Michael McAuliffe5359% games+10.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bradley Congdon
5W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Michael McAuliffe
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Robert Shepard
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
William Lindsay
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
Jordan Olson
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Alan Caffey
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Paul Henkelmann
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Chad Ahrensdorf
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.