Teams

PC Overserved Green Team - C. Eicholtz

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-14vs Buckhorn Lobstars - J. LindemulderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaro Massari / Erika Lee vs Shannon Tompkins / Sonia Isacchi4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesErin Rolle vs Barbara Kouimanis0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-07vs Riverhills - C. CoyleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Eicholtz / Erika Lee vs Christine Coyle / Beth Smedley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErin Rolle vs Susan Wade6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Shea / Melanie Walter vs Ashley Kirkham / Hedy Yuan Hou2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCindy Eicholtz / Erin Rolle vs Michele Curtin / Francesca LoMonaco6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCaro Massari vs VEENA RAMESH7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Shea / Erika Lee vs Meltem SENTURK / Faith Osibodu6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCindy Eicholtz / Erika Lee vs Kathleen Daciek / Karan Orbegoso2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelanie Walter vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Shea / Nancy Cavanaugh vs Siwon Jang / Erika Montanez1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Cindy Eicholtz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Erin Rolle
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Melanie Walter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Jessica Shea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Caro Massari
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Jody Jotham
published
2.02
Nancy Cavanaugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Companioni
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Cavanaugh + Jessica Shea2339% gamesnot enough data
Caro Massari + Jessica Shea303 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Eicholtz + Melanie Walter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Eicholtz
23W–37L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Erin Rolle
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Melanie Walter
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Jessica Shea
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Caro Massari
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jody Jotham
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Nancy Cavanaugh
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Lauren Companioni
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.