Teams

KC-CC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs GR NAVYWon 31
W#1 SinglesDamon Cable vs Jeffery Conaway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Hindes / Jake Cerra vs George Brunet / Robert Childers6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMcCory James vs TJ Green5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / Jason Wolfe vs Trevor Goff / Kevin Smith6-1, 6-2
2026-05-25vs KC-RH NAVYWon 32
W#1 DoublesDamon Cable / Matthew Moore vs Mark Garcia / Matthew Fagan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Andy Stephan3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRonald Kaufman / Andrew Hindes vs Rob Pine / Roger Torres6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMcCory James vs Erik Pigmans3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAudie Rubin / Blake Adams vs Jason Bolinski / Danny Coker0-6, 5-7
2026-05-16vs SS-G BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesScott Adams / Blake Adams vs Dylan Bunch / Steven Louis-prescott6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Kevin Teel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMcCory James / Jake Cerra vs Ross Bradley / Ben White6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRonald Kaufman vs Jeremy Rivera4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / Jason Wolfe vs Jon Trussler / Danny Harrison6-4, 6-1
2026-05-11vs SS-HP BLUEWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatthew Moore / Blake Adams vs Paul Stevinson / Todd Smoots6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDamon Cable vs Mark Imrie6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Adams / Andrew Hindes vs Bret Dolph / Nikolas Eiberger6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRonald Kaufman vs Ben Langford6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJason Wolfe / Bryan DesMarteau vs Caleb Newquist / Gary Horsley6-2, 6-3
2026-05-08vs BM GREENWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatthew Moore / Damon Cable vs Kevin Fuchs / Jared Wolf6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Matt Feldman3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudie Rubin / Blake Adams vs John Cimbura / Ian Brown6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMcCory James vs Jeffrey Moxon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Adams / Jason Wolfe vs Gary Farmar / John Penaligon6-2, 6-1
2026-04-20vs KC-RH NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesBlake Adams / Matthew Moore vs Mark Garcia / Jason Bolinski6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Andy Stephan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDamon Cable / Ronald Kaufman vs Roger Torres / Matthew Fagan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMcCory James vs Marcus Garcia6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Hindes / Jake Cerra vs Tyler Platte / GUY OSBORNE6-2, 6-4
2026-04-13vs GR NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesKiet Killion / Damon Cable vs Daniel Grange / Jeffrey Markle6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRonald Kaufman vs TJ Green6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBlake Adams / Andrew Hindes vs Darin Brazel / Trevor Goff6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Moore / Jason Wolfe vs Andy Black / Nick Lauters6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Andrew Hindes
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Prosper Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
McCory James
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Bryan DesMarteau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Damon Cable
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Ronald Kaufman
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Jason Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Blake Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Jake Cerra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.64
Audie Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kiet Killion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audie Rubin + Blake Adams6157% games+11.2% vs expected
Audie Rubin + Bryan DesMarteau5254% games+2.1% vs expected
Bryan DesMarteau + Damon Cable3352% games+0.1% vs expected
Jason Wolfe + Bryan DesMarteau4162% gamesnot enough data
Audie Rubin + Damon Cable224 matchesnot enough data
Blake Adams + Andrew Hindes314 matchesnot enough data
Audie Rubin + Jake Cerra123 matchesnot enough data
McCory James + Blake Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Hindes
25W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Prosper Wang
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
McCory James
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Bryan DesMarteau
55W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Damon Cable
41W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Ronald Kaufman
41W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Jason Wolfe
28W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Blake Adams
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Jake Cerra
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.67
3
Audie Rubin
52W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Kiet Killion
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.