Teams

DAC/Peters W2.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 2.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#2 DoublesLiane Smith / Amanda Brock vs Jill Schmidt / Lacey Wostal2-6, 3-6
2025-06-19vs Cooper/Posey-Van Lare W2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Oliver / Brennan Edgerton vs Emily van Lare / Amelia Owens6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Mccormack / Mary Elizabeth Johnson vs Andrea VanBebber / Holly Olmstead6-3, 6-3
2025-06-13vs Brookhaven/Rose-Edwards W2.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesJamie Waldrep vs Audrey Mazzu7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Ferguson / Mary Elizabeth Johnson vs Pam Weber / Taylor Darnell-sibal1-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Prestonwood/Micek W2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Oliver / Liane Smith vs Lexie Burke / Kara Prescott6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAmelia Sakowski vs Jordan Teeple4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Bacak / Amy Solum vs Brenda Hogan / Laura Stout6-2, 6-2
2025-05-29Split 11
W#1 DoublesDanielle Oliver / Liane Smith vs Robyn Lilly / Lisa Campbell6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Waldrep vs Anna Gonzalez3-6, 1-6
2025-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Solum / Amy Vanderoef vs Tica Taylor / Jill Schmidt6-2, 6-2
2025-05-20Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Peters / Jamie Waldrep vs Robyn Lilly / Teri Jones6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmelia Sakowski vs Anna Gonzalez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Aughinbaugh / Brennan Edgerton vs Tori Kimmel / Cheyenne Harward7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Cooper/Posey-Van Lare W2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Aughinbaugh / Liane Smith vs Becky Haas / Julie Wells4-6, 5-7
2025-05-10vs Prestonwood/Micek W2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Elizabeth Johnson / Brennan Edgerton vs Lexie Burke / Lindsey Micek6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-08vs Brookhaven/Rose-Edwards W2.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesAmelia Sakowski vs Priscilla Rose3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Charbonnet / Amy Solum vs Audrey Mazzu / Pam Weber5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Kristy White
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.77
Jennifer Wilcox
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.74
Amy Solum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Stephanie Toups
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Jamie Waldrep
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Amy Vanderoef
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.48
Elizabeth Aughinbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Brennan Edgerton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Sarah Charbonnet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Amelia Sakowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Amanda Brock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.96
Renee Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Mccormack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Bacak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Liane Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Elizabeth Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Solum + Jamie Waldrep3249% games+3.2% vs expected
Amy Vanderoef + Stephanie Toups314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Toups + Amy Solum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy White
29W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Jennifer Wilcox
18W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amy Solum
18W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Stephanie Toups
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jamie Waldrep
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Amy Vanderoef
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.52
Elizabeth Aughinbaugh
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Brennan Edgerton
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Sarah Charbonnet
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Amelia Sakowski
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Amanda Brock
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Renee Ferguson
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Erin Mccormack
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Bacak
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liane Smith
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Johnson
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.