Teams

8 Hermitage Fisher

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-19vs 6 ACAC Bardaro/SebeticWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Sadusky / Andrew Bolyard vs William Fields / Jesse Smith1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-12vs 4 ACAC Stephens 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Sadusky / Andrew Bolyard vs Karl Koenig / Philip Nelson6-2, 6-2
2022-05-05vs 2 Salisbury RileyLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Douglas Gray vs Billy Grogan / Ken Riehm6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-21vs 16 Willow Oaks DuntonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Douglas Gray vs Jeffrey Begin / Philip Strunk5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.67
Bryan Fisher
published 4
3.62
Kurt Williams
published
3.62
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.61
Bart Nasta
published 4
3.35
Andrew Bolyard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Douglas Gray
published 3.5
Philip Rackliffe
published
Wood Gyory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Kurt Williams
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Bart Nasta
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Andrew Bolyard
126W–78L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Douglas Gray
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Philip Rackliffe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wood Gyory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.