← Teams

Yu.Barthes18C7.5

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs Al.Sheehan18CLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAngki Sager / Tassie McGannon vs Nancy Harvin / Martha Sanders1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Emalie Levine vs Adrienne Brewer / Elisabeth Sanchez4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Susan Shaw / Diane Allen3-6, 4-6
2023-09-19vs Re.Sears18CLost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Paula Westregard Bjorklund vs Rebecca Sears / Jennifer Wheeler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarlea Ward / Catherine Chavez vs Erin Conigliaro / Liz Arcos0-6, 1-6
2023-09-12vs Ra.Mills18CLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Sara Wilhelmy vs Julee Knight / Tara Roach4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-29vs Ki.Johnson18C7.5Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Bladen Leippe vs Diane Sauer / Sandy Wood1-6, 0-6
2023-08-22vs Je.Fogleman18CLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesHolly Haney / Angki Sager vs Helen Williams / Alison Bernhardt1-6, 1-6
2023-08-15vs La.Ross18CWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesTassie McGannon / Sara Wilhelmy vs Vanese Clough / Lisa Fultz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-08vs Al.Crumpler18CLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Paula Westregard Bjorklund vs Ginny Meier / Kate Whitney0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Emalie Levine
published 3.5
3.05
Wendy Pannell
published —
3.02
Holly Haney
published —
3.01
Sara Wilhelmy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Yuliya Barthes
published —
2.94
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.76
Marlea Ward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Angki Sager
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Haney + Angki Sager1–435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emalie Levine
36W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
—
Wendy Pannell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
—
Holly Haney
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Sara Wilhelmy
60W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
—
Yuliya Barthes
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–236L career · 16 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Marlea Ward
59W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Angki Sager
108W–162L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.