Teams

Sportime Strikers - 65+ 6.0M

2026 65&Over Men · 6.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Conrad Pollack vs Elliot Wiener / Phillip Raclyn5-7, 3-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Levine / James Fanto vs Philippe Cotennec / Paul Curran2-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDan Siegel / Albert Conte vs Fong Chin / James Pezzuto6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesDan Siegel / Richard Cohen vs Fong Chin / Paul Curran3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Abrandt / Albert Conte vs David Lerer / Philippe Cotennec6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / MICHAEL LEO vs David Lerer / Elliot Wiener7-5, 4-5
W#2 DoublesCharles Bauer / Conrad Pollack vs James Pezzuto / Fong Chin7-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Abrandt / David Gage vs Philippe Cotennec / Paul Curran1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesYakov Bindler / Howard Weidner vs Bill Reifer / David Lerer6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngel Alicea / Dan Siegel vs James Pezzuto / Phillip Raclyn6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAngel Alicea / Richard Cohen vs Bill Reifer / Philippe Cotennec7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Gage / Dan Siegel vs Fong Chin / James Pezzuto6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHoward Weidner / James Roth vs Raymond Schaeffer / David Lerer3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Abrandt / Richard Cohen vs Elliot Wiener / Joe Geller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYakov Bindler / Charles Bauer vs Phillip Raclyn / Anthony Frangione5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Levine / James Roth vs James Pezzuto / David Nathanson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Richard Getler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Greg Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Charles Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Levine
published 3.5
3.10
Howard Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Dan Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.02
Albert Conte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
David Gage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Angel Alicea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brian Moran
published 2.5
Conrad Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
James Fanto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
James Roth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeffrey Abrandt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Larry Quain
published
MICHAEL LEO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Yakov Bindler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Siegel + Greg Leeds131551% gamesnot enough data
Richard Cohen + Charles Bauer22663% gamesnot enough data
Dan Siegel + Richard Cohen8356% gamesnot enough data
Greg Leeds + Charles Bauer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Getler
133W–84L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Greg Leeds
74W–50L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Charles Bauer
59W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Levine
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Howard Weidner
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Dan Siegel
42W–35L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Albert Conte
12W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
David Gage
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Angel Alicea
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brian Moran
19W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Conrad Pollack
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
James Fanto
17W–16L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
James Roth
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Abrandt
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Larry Quain
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
MICHAEL LEO
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Richard Cohen
88W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yakov Bindler
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.