Teams

For the Love- Nitta

2024 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-30vs Maple Leafs- RathboneLost 01
L#3 DoublesDUSTY LOCKHART / Julianne Nitta vs Jessica Murray / Judi Shoemaker3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-16vs Get A Grip- ProvidakesLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnie Baba / Diane Schuler vs Wendy Bush / Michelle Tenhaeff2-6, 4-6
2024-04-09vs HarrellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristi Nault / Annie Baba vs Lauren Woolcott / Jennifer Long7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Blackwood / Julianne Nitta vs Daphne Himelfarb / Elizabeth Billings4-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Julianne Nitta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.51
Nami Imaizumi
published
3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.37
Diane Schuler
published 3.5
3.30
Sarah Blackwood
published
DUSTY LOCKHART
published 3.5
3.17
Megan Sultan
published
3.12
Kristi Nault
published
3.08
Annie Baba
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
2.95
Jill White
published
2.77
Kimberly Butler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Schuler + Kristi Nault6447% games−5.6% vs expected
Jill White + Sarah Blackwood213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kane + Megan Sultan123 matchesnot enough data
Julianne Nitta + Sarah Blackwood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julianne Nitta
255W–100L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Nami Imaizumi
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Diane Schuler
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sarah Blackwood
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alexandra Kardasilari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
DUSTY LOCKHART
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Sultan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Annie Baba
96W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jill White
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kimberly Butler
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.