Teams

SoCal/Chang/55&Over8.0M

2025 Adult Division - 55 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 8.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.21 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesKen Chen / Dave Sparks vs Edgardo Cuellar / Leo Bautista7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYing Du / Zhibin Zhang vs Jerry Waliry / Milton Parada6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHoon Park / Andy Chang vs Carlo Bautista / Rudy Tatang3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Arthur Chen
published 4.5
4.24
Ivan Salazar
published 4.5
4.18
4.13
Hoon Park
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.85
Dave Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Yun Kim
published
3.78
John Tatoulian
published
Andy Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Bin Wu
published 4
3.61
Hans Stoehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jun Wan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ken Chen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Frazier
published
Peter Chung
published
Peter Klinovsky
published
Victor Ho
published
Ying Du
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zhibin Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Sparks + John Tatoulian4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Arthur Chen
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Ivan Salazar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
Paul Vincent Salvador
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Hoon Park
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Dave Sparks
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Yun Kim
39W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
John Tatoulian
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Andy Chang
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bin Wu
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hans Stoehr
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jun Wan
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Chen
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Frazier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Chung
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Klinovsky
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Ho
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ying Du
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zhibin Zhang
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.