Teams

CACM RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs GCC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesHelen Young / Diana Rael vs Stephanie Carreira / Colleen Becker0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJaylyn Bunning vs Jan McCaffrey4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Smith / Smita Merchant vs Diedre Wooden / Rebecca Potts6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJena Dupont / Barbara Chin vs Carol Thornock / Jennifer Steelman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-16vs ATC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Barghelame / Barbara Chin vs Kathryn Trujillo / Katie Ozimek6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Ryall / Jena Dupont vs Mary Hogan / Jenifer Vogelpohl6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJaylyn Bunning / Amanda Meier vs Bobbie Brandon / Mary Trujillo6-1, 6-3
2023-07-11vs CHCC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesDiana Rael / Jena Dupont vs Katie Reed / Emily Cunningham3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Loyd vs Alexandra Iseman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Ryall / Barbara Chin vs Adrine Writer / Lisa Pavlakis7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Smith / Amy Frederick vs Anita Burns / Wendy Croney4-6, 3-6
2023-06-27vs SS-H BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesCynthia Smith / Smita Merchant vs Linda Bartels / Jill Spehalski6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJena Dupont vs Dee Zimmerman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Barghelame / Barbara Chin vs Adriana Vernon / Sesha Carbonaro7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJaylyn Bunning / Amanda Meier vs Audra Ramsey / Ann Grace6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-20vs EM NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDiana Rael / Helen Young vs Karen Guzzetta / Stacy Roode1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Kristin Kuruvila4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Ryall / Jill Barghelame vs Pia Lisle / Jackie Orlove2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSmita Merchant / Jaylyn Bunning vs Becca Mahoney / Elizabeth Leonard6-2, 6-4
2023-06-13vs CACM BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJena Dupont / Diana Rael vs Amy Abalos / Liza Butterfield7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJaylyn Bunning vs Carlie Odau2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSmita Merchant / Cynthia Smith vs Susan Ham / Julie Gavrilovic4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Ryall / Jill Barghelame vs Julie Boes / Courtney Kiefer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-06vs SS-D REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHelen Young / Diana Rael vs Denise Dickson / Heather Stohlton6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Kristin Mabbutt1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Smith / Smita Merchant vs Chris Darrow / Jan McClaren7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMegan Ryall / Amy Frederick vs Lana Banbury / Kimberly Graves0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amanda Meier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Jena Dupont
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.73
Barbara Chin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Jill Barghelame
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Smita Merchant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Megan Ryall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Jaylyn Bunning
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.49
Diana Rael
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.16
Amy Frederick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Loyd
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sandra Clemons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Chin + Jill Barghelame5357% games+10.9% vs expected
Diana Rael + Jaylyn Bunning3447% games−5.7% vs expected
Jena Dupont + Megan Ryall1444% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Chin + Diana Rael2351% gamesnot enough data
Jill Barghelame + Megan Ryall314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Barghelame + Amanda Meier314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Barghelame + Diana Rael134 matchesnot enough data
Smita Merchant + Diana Rael213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Meier
62W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Jena Dupont
83W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Chin
50W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jill Barghelame
90W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Smita Merchant
29W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Megan Ryall
111W–112L career · 5 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jaylyn Bunning
72W–87L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Diana Rael
54W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Amy Frederick
24W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Emily Loyd
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Clemons
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.