Teams

Lata18/Rogers/TS

2026 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-04vs LATA18/BROWN/LCTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesChristine Bowman / Susan Brown vs Rebecca Keilty / Karen Buzzetti6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Krask vs Natalie Miller6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTara Rogers / Jamie Fite vs Alison Myers / Le FRYE6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLollie Haselden vs Mckayla Trongo6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadison Crossland / Kate Newsom vs Christa Geib / Laurie Phipps6-1, 6-0
2026-04-13vs LATA18/Nunnery/SSPWon 32
W#1 DoublesTara Rogers / Susan Brown vs Mae Andrews / Angela Mikolajczak6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSarah Krask vs Nonie Morris6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Fencel / Kate Newsom vs Tami Richardson / Katherine Kelly1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMary Crosby vs Libby Mathias6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Powers / Heather Whitley vs Anne Morgan / Deborah Gascon1-6, 6-7
2026-04-06vs LATA 3.0W 18 & Over (Sweeney)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesJamie Fite / Sarah Krask vs Morgan Sweeney / Libby Hagins2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMary Crosby vs Ava Harries4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Bowman / Laura Switzer vs Helen Cupertino / Barbara Belquist3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLollie Haselden vs Ashley Hudson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Whitley / Kate Newsom vs Annagrace Jeffcoat / Kelsey Piotrowski1-6, 1-6
2026-03-25vs LATA18/BROWN/LCTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesChristine Bowman / Susan Brown vs Karen Buzzetti / Tracie Ifkovits7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Crosby vs Natalie Miller6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Fite / Tara Rogers vs Jeanie Farmer / Kelley Parr6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Krask vs Beth Hunter6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKate Newsom / Alyssa Fencel vs Laurie Phipps / Alison Myers7-6, 6-4
2026-03-01vs LATA18/Nunnery/SSPLost 14
L#1 DoublesTara Rogers / Jamie Fite vs Reka Corley / Katherine Kelly4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Crosby vs Libby Mathias2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Smith / Laura Switzer vs Mae Andrews / Joy Krause4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLollie Haselden vs Nonie Morris5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlyssa Fencel / Heather Whitley vs Deborah Gascon / Anne Morgan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-02-16vs LATA 3.0W 18 & Over (Sweeney)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesTara Rogers / Alyssa Fencel vs Anne Belue / Beverly Campbell2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMary Crosby vs Kelsey Piotrowski6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Krask vs Ava Harries1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Bowman / Kate Newsom vs Dawn Horton / Jenny Burden1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 3.0W 18 & Over (Sweeney)131571334387
2Lata18/Burton/LCTC131551537414
3LATA/18/Bailey/LCTC104432763528
4LATA18/Suber/LCC77313982612
5Lata18/Rogers/TS68323882619
6LATA18/BROWN/LCTC1131753111712

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Mary Crosby
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.82
Sarah Krask
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.77
Lollie Haselden
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.57
Christine Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.56
Jamie Fite
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Alyssa Fencel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Tara Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.46
Laura Switzer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Heather Whitley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Kate Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Carol Powers
published 2.5
Cindy Smith
published 2.5
Madison Crossland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Rogers + Jamie Fite3746% games+7.6% vs expected
Christine Bowman + Laura Switzer3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Crosby
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sarah Krask
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Lollie Haselden
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Christine Bowman
19W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.57
Jamie Fite
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Alyssa Fencel
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Tara Rogers
9W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Laura Switzer
24W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Heather Whitley
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Kate Newsom
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Carol Powers
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cindy Smith
2W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Madison Crossland
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.