Teams

WNCL Gilpin (HRC)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Women 6.5 Combo Sun

15 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs WNCM Wiener (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Michal Baird vs Karen King / Tammy Wrenn6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Hare / Loretta Arrington vs Melanie Wiener / Marie Dillingham6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLaurie Guinn / Heather North vs Darcy Gilson / Kimberlin Morley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-16vs WNCP McClurkin (HRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDottie Mattern / Michal Baird vs Kathryn Overstreet / Kendall Pfister6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Boyle / Christina Phan vs Jodi Grabowski / Virginia Spigener6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheri Sparks / Angela Hare vs Susan Baum / Kimberly Harris6-2, 6-4
2026-08-09vs WNCA McAndrews (Peachtree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRoberta Heinrich / Sheri Sparks vs Betty Hollingsworth / Wanda Page6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaurie Guinn / Heather North vs Christine Allan / Ann McAndrews6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Profili / Christina Phan vs Laurie Rogers / Debra Abrams6-2, 6-3
2026-08-02vs WNCB Weinland (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Boyle / Loretta Arrington vs Pamela Harris / Claudia Gavin1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Gay Anderson vs Brenda Cook / Kelley Stines6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoberta Heinrich / Clara Balling vs Kristy Owens / Tammy Wright2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55+ Women 6.5 Combo Sun
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCL Gilpin (HRC)2172564
2WNCA McAndrews (Peachtree)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Cynthia Boyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Laurie Guinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Angela Hare
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Dottie Mattern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Jennifer Profili
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
ALICIA KUBIDA
published 3.5
2.96
Michal Baird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Gay Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Heather North
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Sheri Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Christina Phan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Loretta Arrington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Clara Balling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+7.3% vs expected
Michal Baird + Gay Anderson3258% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Sparks + Clara Balling213 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Sparks + Michal Baird123 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Guinn + Angela Hare213 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Boyle + Dottie Mattern123 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Loretta Arrington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cynthia Boyle
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Laurie Guinn
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Angela Hare
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Dottie Mattern
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Roberta Heinrich
10W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Profili
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
ALICIA KUBIDA
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Michal Baird
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Gay Anderson
17W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Heather North
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sheri Sparks
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Christina Phan
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Loretta Arrington
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Clara Balling
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.