Teams

Zoltek - BigTek 8.5

2026 Frederick Combo · Frederick Combo 8.5 Men

20 players · average NTRP 4.14 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Frederick Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Del Carden
published 4.5
4.39
James Smoot
published 4.5
4.31
Steve French
published
4.30
Christian Boyer
published 4.5
4.22
Neel Parikh
published
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
published 4.5
4.13
Joshua Zoltek
published 4
4.10
Mitchell Furst
published 4
3.98
Bradley Schug
published 4
3.98
3.97
Kevin Dowdell
published
3.96
Jesse Cebulash
published 4
3.86
Jagadish Akula
published 4
3.86
Eric DesRoberts
published
3.81
Andrew Horn
published 4
3.80
Juan Jose Tijero
published 4
3.73
Ali Hamdani
published 4
3.60
Ivan Kozliak
published 4
Hao Du
published
Hunter Shelton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Del Carden + Joshua Zoltek7261% games+13.8% vs expected
Joshua Zoltek + Christopher Bullman10363% games+4.0% vs expected
Lukas Sanidas + Joshua Zoltek9455% games+3.0% vs expected
Del Carden + Christopher Bullman2445% games−8.8% vs expected
Juan Jose Tijero + Joshua Zoltek6161% gamesnot enough data
Ivan Kozliak + Joshua Zoltek1442% gamesnot enough data
Ivan Kozliak + Jesse Cebulash224 matchesnot enough data
James Smoot + Lukas Sanidas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Del Carden
62W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
4.39
Steve French
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Christian Boyer
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Neel Parikh
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Joshua Zoltek
236W–137L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
4.13
4
Mitchell Furst
21W–29L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Bradley Schug
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Christopher Bullman
185W–78L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Kevin Dowdell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.97
4
Jesse Cebulash
330W–107L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Jagadish Akula
49W–74L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Eric DesRoberts
41W–23L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Andrew Horn
8W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Juan Jose Tijero
605W–364L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Ali Hamdani
52W–46L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–286L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Hao Du
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hunter Shelton
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.