Teams

Da.Louzao18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-27vs Mo.Lewis18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarcy Louzao / Maura Tourian vs Suzanne Wahlstrom / Katie Weagel6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesArianna Alvarez vs Callan Fike2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Swauger / Jennifer Welch vs Kristen Press / Anuja Acharya6-1, 6-3
2026-04-20vs La.Gentile18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly DeAngelo / Khelsey Lemon vs Kelly Nels / Lauren Gentile2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Swauger vs Autumn Beam0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJunga Han / Jamee Wallace vs Teran Canterbury / Joli Rueter1-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs Mo.Weimer18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesIsabella Mormando / Savannah Walters vs Kate Haney / Kenna Haney0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Fielitz vs Stephanie Walsh6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Swauger / Jennifer Welch vs Lindsay Rynearson / Sydney Koch0-6
2026-03-23vs Am.Brandon18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJunga Han / Khelsey Lemon vs Mary-Kate Knox / Liz Bottoms6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMolly DeAngelo vs Lisa Hammond6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaura Tourian / Jamee Wallace vs Meredith Russo / Meredith Walter2-6, 0-6
2026-03-22vs Br.Robinson18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesKhelsey Lemon / Katie Fielitz vs Laura Yates / Mary Lewis James6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJacqui Liss vs Olivia Grieser0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaura Tourian / Savannah Walters vs Eva Stancil / Brittany Robinson1-6, 0-6
2026-03-09vs Ma.Harber18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Fielitz / Darcy Louzao vs Rebecca Gronroos / Meaghan Quindlen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesArianna Alvarez vs Allison Mills0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Swauger / Maura Tourian vs Meg Rogers / Maggie Harber6-3, 6-1
2026-03-02vs Mo.Lewis18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly DeAngelo / Jamee Wallace vs Katie Weagel / Suzanne Wahlstrom6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJunga Han vs Hollyanne Compton1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSavannah Walters / Arianna Alvarez vs Tina Goertz / Kristen Press1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Hampton18A8020411125
2Ch.Wellman18A7017410131
3Ca.WilliamsAden18A6115615152
4Me.Frost18A6114717163
5La.Gentile18A6219512135
6Az.Bell18A6216816158
7Br.Robinson18A6216821200
8El.Robinson18A62141021167
9Co.Hicks18A2.55214715144
10Je.Tyndall18A5213818153
11Em.Boyer18A4313817156
12Te.Marcott18A43101123187
13Me.Dougher18A43111024192
14Ma.Harber18A43111024185
15Ja.Stephan18A44131123187
16Ke.Hurter18A3311716129
17Be.Pitt18A3412920161
18Da.Louzao18A3481327198
19Mo.Lewis18A35111329214
20Mo.Weimer18A35101431235
21Ka.Manooch18A2571428201
22Lo.Stevens18A2581329199
23Ra.Rosen18A2571432225
24Ma.Evans18A2691532234
25Jo.Johnson18A2691533237
26Am.Brandon18A2661836224
27Di.Harper18A1531530193
28Je.Glennon18A1661531214
29Ni.Thomas18A0741736227
30Ka.Marotta18A0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Katie Fielitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.49
Khelsey Lemon
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Maura Tourian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Anna Swauger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.29
Molly DeAngelo
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Isabella Mormando
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Darcy Louzao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Jennifer Welch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Jacqui Liss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Jamee Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.95
Arianna Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Junga Han
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.70
Savannah Walters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Fielitz
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.62
2.5
Khelsey Lemon
18W–34L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
Maura Tourian
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Anna Swauger
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Molly DeAngelo
8W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Isabella Mormando
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Darcy Louzao
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Jennifer Welch
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Jacqui Liss
1W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Jamee Wallace
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Arianna Alvarez
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Junga Han
3W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Savannah Walters
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.