Teams

Patterson/Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men 55+ Wed PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesJon Post / Bill Vary vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-18vs Pearson 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesJon Post / Matt Craig vs Clifton Mann / J Byron Rudy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-28vs Pearson 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Patterson / Jon Post vs Stephen Miller / Frank Kincaid6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men 55+ Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
published
3.92
Peter Novosad
published
3.85
Brad McAmis
published 4
3.77
Charles Dawson
published 4
3.67
Jon Post
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jon Knight
published
3.50
Martin Mailloux
published
3.44
David Grubbs
published 3.5
3.38
Bill Vary
published 3.5
3.35
David Patterson
published 4
3.28
Matt Craig
published
3.17
Vince Credle
published
3.04
Charles Moore
published 3.5
Philip Cooke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Novosad + David Grubbs4160% gamesnot enough data
Vince Credle + Matt Craig314 matchesnot enough data
David Grubbs + Jon Knight404 matchesnot enough data
David Patterson + Bill Vary303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Charles Dawson
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jon Post
67W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Jon Knight
26W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.64
Martin Mailloux
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
David Grubbs
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Bill Vary
44W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
4
David Patterson
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
Matt Craig
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Vince Credle
35W–26L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Charles Moore
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Philip Cooke
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.