Teams

CM GREEN

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 7.5 - ITA

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-20vs CACM BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eidson / Neil Roper vs Julie Boes / Tony Chapin6-0, 7-5
2023-08-13vs DTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eidson / Neil Roper vs Steven Ellstrom / Helene Grall-Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-06vs CP ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Roper / Neil Roper vs Nola Nelson / Benjamin Albright6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Heerdt / Jim Roper vs Casey Thomas / Rick Lannon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-30vs WP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesNeil Roper / Cathy Roper vs Bruce Silver / Tamara Bianchi3-6, 2-6
2023-07-23vs NJ TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Roper / Kathleen Heerdt vs Girish Nair / Patti Poole2-6, 1-6
2023-07-16vs WP ORANGELost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Roper / Kathleen Heerdt vs Chad Whitmer / Laura Wasserman2-6, 5-7
2023-07-09vs NJ YELLOWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathleen Heerdt / Jim Roper vs Fetu Nuuvali / Linda Prior3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Roper / Cathy Roper vs Ron Funderburke / Alison Shaw6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brent Slosky
published 4
3.64
Kathleen Heerdt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.19
Michelle Eidson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Michael Donovan
published
3.09
Jim Roper
published
3.01
Cathy Roper
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Neil Roper
published
Terri Cohen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Roper + Jim Roper01129% games−14.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brent Slosky
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Kathleen Heerdt
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Michelle Eidson
86W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Michael Donovan
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jim Roper
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cathy Roper
50W–112L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Neil Roper
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Cohen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.