Teams

MTC - Cooper

2026 Adult 18 & Over Men Winter - Mobile · 3.5 Men Winter

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-10vs MO - Nguyen/WruckLost 14
L#1 DoublesDarren Barrett / John McAnnally vs Eric Brechtel / Jimmy Alford3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Andres Modinger6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoey Huettemann / Howard Galloway II vs James Nguyen / Michael Hamner3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesChris Bonham vs Julien Chauvet6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDaniel Dahlen / Ernest Ladd vs Scott Sasser / Sam Wilson0-6, 4-6
2026-02-03vs MTC - Lindsey/WojtalaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoey Huettemann / Howard Galloway II vs Lee Redditt / Christian Clark6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChris Bonham vs Cody Reilmann6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesThomas Jackson / Daniel Dahlen vs Jesse Hall / Edward Powers1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-27vs MTC - Nimityongskul/CabralWon 50
W#1 DoublesJohn McAnnally / Darren Barrett vs Reeve Cabral / Sean O'Neill6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Aaron Stricklin7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHenry Williams / Joey Huettemann vs Davis Hall / Tyler Warren6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChris Bonham vs Varin Nimityongskul6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErnest Ladd / Patrick McPhillips vs Mckingley Ngamvilay / Farzam Bayat6-4, 6-1
2026-01-20vs MO - Nguyen/WruckLost 14
L#1 DoublesHoward Galloway II / John McAnnally vs Douglas Wruck / Jimmy Alford2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Andres Modinger3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHenry Williams / David Gilmore vs Eric Brechtel / Julien Chauvet2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChris Bonham vs Sam Hall4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoey Huettemann / Ernest Ladd vs James Nguyen / Forrest Fontenot4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-13vs MTC - Lindsey/WojtalaWon 41
W#1 DoublesHoward Galloway II / John McAnnally vs Edward Powers / Michael Reid6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Jesse Hall6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJoey Huettemann / David Gilmore vs Evan Wojtala / Lee Redditt6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChris Bonham vs Cody Reilmann6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Dahlen / Henry Williams vs Joshua Cooper / Cohen Greene6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-06vs MTC - Nimityongskul/CabralWon 32
W#1 DoublesHoward Galloway II / John McAnnally vs Gregory Kendall / Reeve Cabral6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHenry Williams vs Aaron Stricklin4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Gilmore / Patrick McPhillips vs Farzam Bayat / Mark LaRose6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChris Bonham vs Varin Nimityongskul6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Dahlen / Joey Huettemann vs Mark Davis / Sean O'Neill2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Patrick McPhillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Darren Barrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Thomas Jackson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
David Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Chris Bonham
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
John McAnnally
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ernest Ladd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Howard Galloway II
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Joey Huettemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Henry Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Bryan Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Daniel Dahlen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gilmore + Patrick McPhillips404 matchesnot enough data
Ernest Ladd + Daniel Dahlen224 matchesnot enough data
Ernest Ladd + Howard Galloway II224 matchesnot enough data
John McAnnally + Howard Galloway II224 matchesnot enough data
John McAnnally + Darren Barrett213 matchesnot enough data
Darren Barrett + Howard Galloway II303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick McPhillips
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Darren Barrett
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Thomas Jackson
17W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
David Gilmore
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Chris Bonham
19W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
John McAnnally
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Ernest Ladd
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Howard Galloway II
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Joey Huettemann
18W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Henry Williams
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Bryan Cooper
10W–18L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Daniel Dahlen
4W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.