Teams

TYCC Biller's Ballers - S. Biller

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs HCC - MacCulloughLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Tania Biller vs Mike Moenter / Kirsten Willis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Carolyn Franca vs Karen Blount / David Porter1-6, 4-6
2022-03-13vs Hills - HCC Vamos/OrsiniLost 02
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Gail Gibson / Jaime Villegas2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Carolyn Franca vs Manuel Alvarez / Nina Mortazavi3-6, 5-7
2022-02-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Lindsey Robbins vs Craig Hajdich / Karen Blount2-6, 2-6
2022-02-24vs HCC - MacCulloughSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Mike Moenter / Kathleen Stein7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Gregg Coldiron vs Clark MacCullough / Bobbi Witt5-7, 3-6
2022-02-20vs Hills - HCC Vamos/OrsiniSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Jaime Villegas / Stephanie Wager4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Kimberly French vs Nina Mortazavi / Richard Sobieray6-2, 6-4
2022-01-31vs Hills - HCC Vamos/OrsiniLost 01
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Anthony Hatori / Maki Smith4-6, 6-7
2022-01-26vs HCC - MacCulloughLost 02
L#2 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Andria Owen vs Karen Blount / Justin Milne4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Clark MacCullough / Jillene Davis6-7, 5-7
2022-01-09vs Hills - HCC Vamos/OrsiniLost 01
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Tania Biller vs Margaret Roset / Anthony Hatori5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samuel Biller
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.26
Andria Owen
published 4.5
4.05
3.89
RICHARD CASEY
published
3.74
Lindsey Robbins
published
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Gregg Coldiron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Kevin Platt
published
Kimberly French
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Biller + Samuel Biller21139% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Andria Owen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
4.05
RICHARD CASEY
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
Lindsey Robbins
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gregg Coldiron
20W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kevin Platt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly French
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.