Teams

Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: Team Advintage 55

2025 55&Over Women · 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2025-08-08vs GoffinWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Debra Murray / Regina Lindsay7-5, 6-1
2025-08-04vs GoffinWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Myndi Hill vs Jennifer Evans / Theresa Cary6-1, 6-2
2025-07-28vs MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Silver Schlecker / Venus Jones vs Lori Abrams / Monique Bluhm6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Sniffen / Mary Mondello vs Helene Ginsburg / Maryann Cantone6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Carol Myers vs Felicia DeSanto / Yumi Nagahama4-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Miller / Jan Strack vs Brigitte Tanner / Bea Tully6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Carol Myers vs Joan Hiam / Evelyn Hagenow6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Veteska / Elizabeth Laitman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-14vs GoffinWon 10
W#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Debra Murray / Theresa Cary6-3, 6-1
2025-07-13vs MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesVenus Jones / Susan Silver Schlecker vs Margaret Kienzle / Lisa Dawson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Miller / Jan Strack vs Dawn Hone / Monique Bluhm6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Burns / Faith Ackerman vs Maryann Cantone / Jennifer Redman1-6, 5-7
2025-07-07vs Eastern/Ifshin/55&Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Miller / Mary Sniffen vs Alicia Ifshin / Ann Zaminski6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Mondello / Nora Holmes vs Ellen Schubert / Makiko Togo6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Christine Burns vs Amy Kaufman / Stefani Shavel6-4, 7-5
2025-06-30vs Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Mondello / Jan Strack vs Ondrea Schiciano / Kristen Woll6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Sniffen / Victoria Madonna vs Leslie Lombino / Laura Saggese6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFaith Ackerman / Christine Moore vs Bea Tully / Hildi Todrin6-2, 7-6
2025-06-23vs Eastern/Ifshin/55&Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJan Strack / Sharon Ollivierre vs Alicia Ifshin / Ann Zaminski0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVenus Jones / Susan Silver Schlecker vs Makiko Togo / Roge Nesbitt6-3, 6-5
L#3 DoublesJoan Veteska / Jennifer Corrado vs Maureen Fearon / Nurit Praeger3-6, 4-6
2025-06-09vs Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Myers / Mary Sniffen vs Ann Horowitz / Eileen Raleigh6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Burns / Michele Miller vs Kim Mixer / Bea Tully6-4, 5-4
W#3 DoublesJoan Veteska / Faith Ackerman vs Evelyn Hagenow / Hildi Todrin6-3, 6-3
2025-06-09vs Having a BallWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Ashley Gregor vs Jackie Fiore / Susan Nye6-2, 6-3
2025-06-02vs Eastern/Ifshin/55&Over8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Miller / Mary Sniffen vs Alicia Ifshin / Debbie Cannavino2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Silver Schlecker / Christine Burns vs Jane Foster / Margo Smith2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJudy Rutcofsky / Elizabeth Laitman vs Ellen Schubert / Roge Nesbitt0-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 55Won 21
L#1 DoublesNora Holmes / Mary Mondello vs Felicia DeSanto / Lisa Dawson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Ollivierre / Jan Strack vs Lori Abrams / Berry Ravitz6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Moore / Jennifer Corrado vs Wendy Hyer / Deanna Santoro6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Ifshin/55&Over8.0W0919617199
2Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: Team Advintage 5509171022225
3MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 5509141226220
4Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 550922451322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Mary Mondello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Venus Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Sharon Ollivierre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Mary Sniffen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Faith Ackerman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Jan Strack
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.54
Michele Miller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.54
Susan Silver Schlecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Corrado
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.52
Nora Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Carol Myers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Christine Burns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
3.23
Christine Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Joan Veteska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Rovena Juman
published
Elizabeth Laitman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Rutcofsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faith Ackerman + Christine Burns5253% games+5.6% vs expected
Susan Silver Schlecker + Venus Jones121053% games+5.1% vs expected
Jan Strack + Carol Myers2442% games+3.0% vs expected
Jan Strack + Venus Jones8160% games+2.6% vs expected
Mary Sniffen + Michele Miller12656% games+2.2% vs expected
Mary Mondello + Nora Holmes171948% games+1.0% vs expected
Mary Sniffen + Carol Myers202249% games+0.5% vs expected
Sharon Ollivierre + Venus Jones11854% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Mondello
237W–161L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Venus Jones
175W–145L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Victoria Madonna
223W–148L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Sharon Ollivierre
249W–185L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Mary Sniffen
101W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Faith Ackerman
135W–125L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Jan Strack
141W–106L career · 8 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Michele Miller
97W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Susan Silver Schlecker
59W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Jennifer Corrado
128W–170L career · 7 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
4
Nora Holmes
181W–161L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Carol Myers
109W–144L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Christine Burns
130W–153L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Heide Marie Bliss
92W–98L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Christine Moore
158W–152L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Joan Veteska
53W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Rovena Juman
68W–85L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Elizabeth Laitman
14W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judy Rutcofsky
35W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.