Teams

Meadowgrove (Sarah Ackerman)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-06vs Hickory Springs (Marianne Gopel)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesMadhavi Vajani / Tina Reilly vs Linda Spoon / Jillian Kirschner6-7, 6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNeelam Varas vs Dorreen Thomas6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSterling Lanken / Reagan Charney vs Mara Clauson / Jennifer Brimer1-6, 2-6
2025-12-14vs Terrell Mill (Maureen Griffin)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesTina Reilly / Sarah Ackerman vs Kirsten Holthaus / Carolyn Mayer6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNeelam Varas vs Alison Brown6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Williams / Rhonda Jones vs Felice Myers / Sue Gilbert2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHeather Miller / ASHLEY LEWIS vs Cynthia Eller / Maureen Griffin1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesEva Johnson / Jo Williams vs Teresa Thompson / Donna Folkner6-3, 7-6
2025-12-09vs USTA Atlanta/Paula LinkLost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Ackerman / Medha Dhawan vs Maria Adams / Paula Link6-4, 4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNeelam Varas vs Sara Young2-1
W#2 DoublesTina Reilly / Madhavi Vajani vs Bridget Kratt / Diane Sohl7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSterling Lanken / Nina Gibson vs Joy Martin / Kate Dellinger4-6, 6-4, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJo Williams / Reagan Charney vs Andi Loucks / Linda Corless2-6, 2-6
2025-11-18vs Hickory Springs (Marianne Gopel)*Split 22
W#1 SinglesSterling Lanken vs Nikki Roberson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBetsy Matz / Madhavi Vajani vs Joyce Byrd / Marianne Gopel6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesNina Gibson / Dana Stannard vs Cheryl Boncimino / Rose Grove6-3, 6-3
L#4 DoublesHeather Miller / Jo Williams vs Jennifer Brimer / Dorreen Thomas1-6, 2-6
2025-11-11vs USTA Atlanta/Paula LinkLost 13
L#1 DoublesTina Reilly / Neelam Varas vs Paula Link / Maria Adams6-4, 4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSterling Lanken vs Rika Eloff3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEva Johnson / Reagan Charney vs Thereza Giovannini / Joy Martin6-3, 3-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesNina Gibson / Sarah Ackerman vs Linda Corless / Andi Loucks6-1, 6-0
2025-11-04vs Terrell Mill (Maureen Griffin)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesBetsy Matz / Mary Williams vs Rene Moase / Felice Myers7-6, 2-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesASHLEY LEWIS vs Melissa Cannon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Ackerman / Medha Dhawan vs Sue Gilbert / Kirsten Holthaus6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMadhavi Vajani / Dana Stannard vs Cynthia Eller / Maureen Griffin2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJo Williams / Sterling Lanken vs Alison Brown / Bonnie Ladd4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Betsy Matz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Neelam Varas
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Tina Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
ASHLEY LEWIS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Dana Stannard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ashley Duryea
published 3
2.68
Nina Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Sterling Lanken
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Deepa Paramesh
published 3
2.66
Eva Johnson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Reagan Charney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Jo Williams
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Madhavi Vajani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Rhonda Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Medha Dhawan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Ackerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Williams + Rhonda Jones134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Matz
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Neelam Varas
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Tina Reilly
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
ASHLEY LEWIS
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dana Stannard
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Ashley Duryea
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Nina Gibson
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Sterling Lanken
30W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Deepa Paramesh
1W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Eva Johnson
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Reagan Charney
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
Jo Williams
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Madhavi Vajani
18W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Rhonda Jones
4W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Medha Dhawan
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Ackerman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.