GEPTA/40&over/3.5W/Castaneda/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEPTA

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43

BLANCA REYES GAMEZ

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5

3.33

ALEJANDRA MONROY

usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5

3.30

Cristal Tirado

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.03

Daniela Ortiz

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.61

Angelica Neve

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

—

Felisa Fuentes

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published —

—

Ivette Acosta

usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published —

—

Laura Soto

usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Lluvia Bordier

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Monica Medina

usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Paola Tirado

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Rocio Avila

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published —

—

Roma Fonseca

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published —

—

Sabrina Monroy

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published —

—

Sandra Castaneda

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published —

—

Tatiana Fernandez

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Castaneda + ALEJANDRA MONROY	15–7	58% games	not enough data
Sabrina Monroy + Rocio Avila	11–4	59% games	not enough data
Cristal Tirado + Angelica Neve	8–6	49% games	not enough data
Roma Fonseca + ALEJANDRA MONROY	9–2	71% games	not enough data
Roma Fonseca + Sabrina Monroy	6–4	58% games	not enough data
Sandra Castaneda + Angelica Neve	3–6	48% games	not enough data
Monica Medina + Rocio Avila	5–4	51% games	not enough data
Angelica Neve + ALEJANDRA MONROY	4–4	59% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

BLANCA REYES GAMEZ

14W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%69%31%

3.43

3.5

ALEJANDRA MONROY

45W–23L career · 11 lines in 2026

1%88%11%

3.33

3.5

Cristal Tirado

28W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

3.30

Daniela Ortiz

21W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026

<1%42%58%

3.03

Angelica Neve

30W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026

22%78%<1%

2.61

—

Felisa Fuentes

57W–22L career · 30 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ivette Acosta

22W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Soto

40W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lluvia Bordier

37W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Monica Medina

38W–25L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Paola Tirado

9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rocio Avila

58W–30L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Roma Fonseca

55W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sabrina Monroy

43W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sandra Castaneda

59W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Tatiana Fernandez

51W–15L career · 34 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.