Teams

PInellas/Buckner

2026 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 M Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-21vs Seminole Lake Hutton 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Zack / Eugen Schwarz vs Brian Hodapp / Marcel Bourque2-4
W#2 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Chuck Goldberg / Michael Fernandez2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBritt Decker / James Smiechewicz vs Gary Hutton / John Hockin6-4, 6-0
2026-03-14vs McMullen Banditos 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Bill Calafiura / Doug Clery4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBritt Decker / Michael MacIntire vs Daren McGovern / Christopher Hollingsworth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / James Smiechewicz vs Brian Williams / Mark Reagan5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-28vs Seminole Lake Hutton 55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJose Alomar / James Smiechewicz vs Brian Hodapp / Tom Berning2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert B Buckner / Britt Decker vs Chuck Goldberg / Michael Fernandez0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / Jacob Munch vs Colin Fitzgearl / Monty Johnson5-7, 1-6
2026-02-21vs McMullen Banditos 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Zack / James Smiechewicz vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Brian Williams7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Eugen Schwarz vs Steven Rattner / Michael Laccabue5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-07vs Seminole Lake Hutton 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Brian Hodapp / Michael Fernandez6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Smiechewicz / Britt Decker vs Monty Johnson / Tom Berning5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Paul Zack vs John Hockin / Pierre Lewin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-31vs McMullen Banditos 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Zack / William Arfsten vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Brian Williams6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Eugen Schwarz vs Steven Rattner / Andrew Newman6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJose Alomar / Sylvain Gauthier vs Daren McGovern / Michael Laccabue1-6, 4-6
2026-01-24vs Seminole Lake Hutton 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Chuck Goldberg / Monty Johnson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBritt Decker / Michael MacIntire vs Tom Berning / Colin Fitzgearl1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert B Buckner / CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON vs Michael Fernandez / Brian Hodapp0-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs McMullen Banditos 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Alomar / Sylvain Gauthier vs Daren McGovern / Michael Laccabue3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Eugen Schwarz vs Doug Clery / Andrew Newman6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGvozden Dokic / William Arfsten vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Warren Johnson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
James Smiechewicz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Eugen Schwarz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Paul Zack
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
William Arfsten
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.81
Britt Decker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Jose Alomar
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.71
Sylvain Gauthier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Michael MacIntire
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Jacob Munch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Robert B Buckner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gvozden Dokic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Gauthier + Jose Alomar5256% games+5.5% vs expected
Jose Alomar + William Arfsten7158% games−0.7% vs expected
Sylvain Gauthier + Paul Zack2348% gamesnot enough data
Britt Decker + Michael MacIntire3244% gamesnot enough data
Eugen Schwarz + Michael MacIntire213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
James Smiechewicz
15W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
William Arfsten
11W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Britt Decker
48W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Michael MacIntire
72W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Robert B Buckner
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.