Teams

KHart/RDrees (Blakeney)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-03vs LSelland/LMulcahy (Sardis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Drees / Smita Thakur vs Lynn Selland / Lauren Mulcahy6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Wright / Sridevi Ganesan vs Colleen Priest / Sarah Asby3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Griset / Jennifer Robinette vs Kathleen Lowe / Heidi Witzel6-3, 6-1
2022-09-26vs CChildress (Matthews)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaty Hart / Anita Stewart-Stover vs Paula Donoghue / Janet Baker3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDipti Jagannath / Michelle Wright vs Donna Musante / Keri Cantrell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTara Tyson / Sanami Nakai vs Tracy Stamey / Cheri King3-6, 2-6
2022-09-19vs THolwager (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIndia Branker / Sridevi Ganesan vs Daniela Pagano / Bilan Mo6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Drees / Smita Thakur vs Vickie Koskinas / Michele Ovendorf6-3, 6-4
2022-09-12vs LAndersen (Chestnut Square)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Griset / Katy Hart vs Sarah Krenz / Jane Lee7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIndia Branker / Michele Olsen vs Stephanie Gossert / Becky Shopf6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSridevi Ganesan / Smita Thakur vs Carolyn Henderson / Sandi Lovell6-0, 6-3
2022-08-29vs KBrannock (Weddington)Split 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Turner Bearss / Katy Hart vs Julie Alexander / Bobbie McManus7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRachel Drees / Tara Tyson vs Barb Marthinsen / Amy Barrett4-6, 5-7
2022-08-22vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSanami Nakai / Michelle Wright vs Holly McClure / Heather Rhyne6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Drees / Tara Tyson vs Caroline Sjogren / Marisa Haehnlein1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesIndia Branker / Jennifer Robinette vs Tiffany Vaughn / Mindy Zimmerman6-3, 6-4
2022-08-15vs LSelland/LMulcahy (Sardis)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wright / Dipti Jagannath vs Lynn Selland / Lauren Mulcahy3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Anita Stewart-Stover vs Renee Broud / Heidi Witzel2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Griset / Diane Turner Bearss vs Kathleen Lowe / Katherine Jay6-3, 7-5
2022-08-08vs CChildress (Matthews)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSanami Nakai / Smita Thakur vs Cheri King / Paula Donoghue4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesIndia Branker / Diane Turner Bearss vs Donna Musante / Karen Schmit3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Griset / Tara Tyson vs Mary Parker / Janet Baker3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Smita Thakur
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Katy Hart
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
India Branker
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.45
Jennifer Robinette
published
3.38
Tara Tyson
published
3.32
Michele Olsen
published
3.26
Dipti Jagannath
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Sanami Nakai
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Jill Griset
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Rachel Drees
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Sridevi Ganesan
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Diane Turner Bearss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Olsen + Jennifer Robinette131155% games+4.9% vs expected
India Branker + Smita Thakur5840% games+1.4% vs expected
Michele Olsen + Rachel Drees3348% games−0.3% vs expected
Smita Thakur + Katy Hart8650% games−0.5% vs expected
Sanami Nakai + Dipti Jagannath7849% games−2.5% vs expected
Tara Tyson + Katy Hart4546% games−2.9% vs expected
Sanami Nakai + Smita Thakur9652% games−4.3% vs expected
Jill Griset + Katy Hart0635% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Smita Thakur
79W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Katy Hart
65W–130L career · 9 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
India Branker
47W–71L career · 11 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jennifer Robinette
45W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tara Tyson
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Michele Olsen
33W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dipti Jagannath
155W–104L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Anita Stewart-Stover
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sanami Nakai
118W–87L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jill Griset
32W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Rachel Drees
46W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Sridevi Ganesan
63W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Diane Turner Bearss
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.