Teams

LDWI-Winton/LNTC

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 4.5 Saturday

5 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-14vs LSNestor/PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Karlsson / Jasen Fici vs Ted Campbell / Kurt Thielemann6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-14vs LKHaynes/Westport 40s 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Scott Plemmons vs Mark Crane / Steven Kayton1-6, 2-6
2022-05-02vs LMMcMahon/PeninsulaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Charles Quinn vs Todd Moyer / Brad Rush3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJasen Fici / Charles Hayes vs Jeb Courtney / William Schirmer3-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs LNielsen/CSDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / John Gay vs Chad Hendrix / Robert Eric Nielsen1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSteve Brinkman vs Rogers Warner1-6, 4-6
2022-04-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Quinn / Steve Brinkman vs Michael Ferrero / Baker Arrowood3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-26vs LSNestor/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Joshua Courtney vs Ted Campbell / William Carey3-6, 2-6
2022-03-15vs LMMcMahon/PeninsulaLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Karlsson / Steve Brinkman vs Bill Moore / Todd Moyer5-7, 3-6
2022-03-05vs LNielsen/CSDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Bo Wheeler vs Douglas Hausler / Chad Hendrix2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJasen Fici vs Rogers Warner0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Steve Brinkman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
Daniel Winton
published 4
3.94
Jasen Fici
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.93
Charles Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Scott Plemmons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Brinkman + Charles Quinn2941% gamesnot enough data
Jasen Fici + Steve Brinkman5351% gamesnot enough data
Jasen Fici + Charles Quinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Steve Brinkman
67W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Daniel Winton
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Jasen Fici
102W–226L career · 6 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Charles Quinn
70W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
Scott Plemmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.