Teams

PL-Vamos! Team Preciado

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-15vs RBW-String Theory 2-GibsonLost 23
L#1 DoublesCheryl Wate / Sara Miller vs Elena Ivanova / Barbara Wood1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNicolle Sherwood vs Heather Mathews6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJan Day / Carol LaMoria vs Takako Chavez / Maren Gibson5-7, 2-3
W#2 SinglesNina Podlesnyak vs Gunjan Tykodi6-3, 3-5
L#3 DoublesAmy Friedman / Kriss Wells vs Jo Gartenberg / Elizabeth Miller3-6, 0-6
2021-06-01vs BAIN-Play It Forward-SunshineLost 23
L#1 DoublesNicolle Sherwood / Marisa Preciado vs Jacki Malitzski / Stephanie Viele4-6, 5-6
L#1 SinglesNina Podlesnyak vs A C6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Friedman / Nicole Rhea vs Irva Cooper / Emma Scanlan Dressler6-7, 0-3
W#2 SinglesMelissa Bode vs Pamela Olson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJan Day / Sara Miller vs Amy Wetter / Rebecca Whitlock6-2, 4-4
2021-05-25vs ETC-Slice Girls-LarsenWon 41
W#1 DoublesMarisa Preciado / Nicolle Sherwood vs Ursula Heenan / Dawn Apacible6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNina Podlesnyak vs Anna Ruffini3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Wate / Sara Miller vs Ginny Larsen / Debbie Lo5-7, 5-2
W#2 SinglesMelissa Bode vs Jacque Cao6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJan Day / Nicole Rhea vs Evelyn Wong / Aliya Khan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-18vs BC-NewmanWon 50
W#1 DoublesMarisa Preciado / Nicolle Sherwood vs Jeanie van Amen / Gretchen Bunker6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNina Podlesnyak vs Shari Ojendyk6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Friedman / Cheryl Wate vs Karen Vanderhoek / Monica Gianni6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMelissa Bode vs Nur Ozkaraoglu6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Miller / Mary Lane vs Rebecca LAUGHLIN / Grace Newman6-4, 2-4, 1-0
2021-05-12vs BC-BlochLost 05
L#1 DoublesNicolle Sherwood / Marisa Preciado vs Shawna Dash / Jennifer Gardner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKriss Wells vs Anna Graves0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Wate / Sara Miller vs Stacy Mathers / Susan Hansen4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCarol LaMoria vs Eileen Wang5-7, 3-3
L#3 DoublesMelissa Bode / Nicole Rhea vs Jill Hancock / Lisa Cheung3-6, 3-6
2021-05-11vs TCSP-Alleycats-MurchWon 32
W#1 DoublesNicolle Sherwood / Marisa Preciado vs Laura Hanson Morgan / Maura Dunn6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNicole Rhea vs Pamela Schwartz1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol LaMoria / Jan Day vs Pey-Lin Carroll / Amy Knobbs5-7, 3-3
W#2 SinglesMelissa Bode vs Sarah Holt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Wate / Sara Miller vs Shonagh Pleas / Erika Johansen6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-28vs HBSQ-MillertimeLost 14
W#1 DoublesMarisa Preciado / Nicolle Sherwood vs Sarah Boland / Mona Carter6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarol LaMoria vs April Thompson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNicole Rhea / Melissa Bode vs Anna Matysik / Hui Hong6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKriss Wells vs Shawn Thornsberry0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Wate / Mary Lane vs Kathryn Strecker / Susan James2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-20vs CP-OttesenWon 41
L#1 DoublesMelissa Bode / Nicole Rhea vs Joette Dalton / Priyanka Joshi6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNicolle Sherwood vs Lisa Kerslake6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Wate / Sara Miller vs Dana Cocales / Annie Ottesen7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMarisa Preciado vs Ok Clark6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Friedman / Carol LaMoria vs Mingming Zhan / Susan Bergeson7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings40 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-Pham 3.0W80301023253
2RBW-Wyman8031923246
3AYTC-Serve Us a Double-Zakahi7134616210
4MI-Serve-Aces & Limes-Shea7132821257
5FC-Basha Tennis-Price71281225282
6TCSP-Alleycats-Murch71261433310
7AYTC-Super Bueno-Low62291123257
8ETC-Anderson62291127284
9TCSP-Smash-Reudink62291128251
10ETC-Sharks-Daniels62301029298
11BAIN-Play It Forward-Sunshine62241639332
12CP-Simply Smashing-Darrow53261429267
13STC-Ace of Base-Baker53251531292
14CP-Central Perk-Wong53241635305
15WSC-Buck Wild53221838323
16ETC-Team Serve It Up-Swiftney53221841356
17TCSP-Smash Girls-Volk53211942347
18RBW-String Theory 2-Gibson44211939329
19PL-Vamos! Team Preciado44211943332
20ETC-No Strings Attached-Janson44202043329
21BTA-Rotival44202044382
22CAC/SL-NetNuts-Rauen35221841305
23ETC-Slice Girls-Larsen35192143349
24BC-Wilwerding35192148362
25BETC-Grove/Ikeda35192150389
26TCSP-Net Gain-Saddler35182251364
27TCSP-Vogel26172348395
28AYTC (OUTDOORS) Team Golden26152552395
29BC-Newman26103053393
30HBSQ-Millertime26172354388
31MI-Brant26152554374
32ETC-Double The Fun-Smith26122855384
33MC W 3.0 Jay26132758390
34BETC-Smash It-Truong26103065435
35AYTC-Team Awesome Fun-Lu/Lusty17103062409
36TCSP-Netchix-Swanson1793164429
37BC-McLemore1783266401
38TCSP-Lesirge/Smith1783266434
39CAC/SL-Wonder Women-Miller0853569446
40WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer0863471445

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Marisa Preciado
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Nicolle Sherwood
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.14
Carol LaMoria
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Amy Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Cheryl Wate
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.94
Melissa Bode
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.90
Nicole Rhea
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Sara Miller
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.68
Jan Day
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Kriss Wells
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Mary Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Podlesnyak
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol LaMoria + Marisa Preciado5072% games+19.7% vs expected
Cheryl Wate + Carol LaMoria11169% games+12.2% vs expected
Sara Miller + Amy Friedman11165% games+5.8% vs expected
Melissa Bode + Nicole Rhea251258% games+4.7% vs expected
Nicolle Sherwood + Marisa Preciado111153% games+4.5% vs expected
Carol LaMoria + Nicolle Sherwood3452% games+1.5% vs expected
Sara Miller + Melissa Bode6454% games−0.2% vs expected
Amy Friedman + Jan Day2356% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marisa Preciado
62W–71L career · 14 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Nicolle Sherwood
51W–48L career · 14 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carol LaMoria
97W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Amy Friedman
57W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Cheryl Wate
68W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Melissa Bode
73W–28L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Nicole Rhea
53W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Sara Miller
87W–64L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jan Day
26W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Kriss Wells
35W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Mary Lane
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nina Podlesnyak
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.