Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-09-28vs ROUND HILL CC CW7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJessie Du / Pia Moore vs Marci Dublin / Janice Cain6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.77
Garbo Berger
published 4
3.66
Cecile Chenevey
published 4
3.50
Violeta Franco
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
3.45
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.44
Diana Babayan
published 3.5
3.39
Pia Moore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jessica Kelmon
published
3.27
Nancy Blom
published
3.26
Corri Synak
published 3.5
3.26
Julia Petrov
published
3.21
Cathy Althoff
published 3.5
2.93
Maria Chiang
published
2.88
Jessica Zhang
published
Jessie Du
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Blom + Cathy Althoff5646% games−4.0% vs expected
Ning Docena + Jessica Kelmon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Garbo Berger
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cecile Chenevey
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Violeta Franco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Cindy Turner
19W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Jessica Kelmon
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Nancy Blom
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Corri Synak
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Julia Petrov
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Althoff
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jessica Zhang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.88
Jessie Du
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.