Teams

GEPTA/Lefevre/18&over/4.5W

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Carrie Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
Hope Perez
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 4.5
4.37
Courteney Park
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.35
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.27
Elissa Perches
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.11
Andrea Andujo M
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.84
Erika Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Delaney Kuehnel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
MarieJosee Lefebvre
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Megan Harris
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Perez + MarieJosee Lefebvre121150% games+2.4% vs expected
Hope Perez + Lia Shelton5356% gamesnot enough data
Elissa Perches + Andrea Andujo M4261% gamesnot enough data
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez + Courteney Park5066% gamesnot enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre + Erika Delgado213 matchesnot enough data
Cathey Jo Alberson + Carrie Alberson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carrie Alberson
6W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Hope Perez
43W–44L career · 19 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Courteney Park
71W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez
42W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Elissa Perches
15W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrea Andujo M
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Delaney Kuehnel
32W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 14 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
Lia Shelton
144W–91L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre
103W–76L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Harris
66W–10L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.