Teams

Team 5 Lunar Legends 3.5

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-07vs Team 7 Tennis BonesLost 01
L#2 SinglesHongyangyang Shi vs Sean Yang1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-26vs Team 3 Racqueeteers SinglesWon 10
W#3 SinglesHongyangyang Shi vs Adnan Karimi6-0, 6-2
2025-09-20vs Team 12 Stringing WinnersWon 30
W#1 SinglesGuangyi Wang vs Doan Nguyen6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesXiangyu Huang vs Tan Nguyen7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJesse Tu vs Ryan Tucker6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Guangyi Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.62
Xiangyu Huang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.53
James Pan
published 3.5
3.53
Xin Geng
published
3.36
Jesse Tu
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Jie Wang
published
3.30
Hongyangyang Shi
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Chung-Kai Hsiao
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jie Wang + Guangyi Wang1550% games+10.2% vs expected
Hongyangyang Shi + Guangyi Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Guangyi Wang
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
Xiangyu Huang
14W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
James Pan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Xin Geng
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jesse Tu
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jie Wang
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Hongyangyang Shi
38W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chung-Kai Hsiao
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.