Teams

Colonial CC - Dunbar

2026 LeeCharlotte Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 W

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-08vs Babcock National - RevisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa DeLauder / Jennifer Rinne vs Sharon McCaw / Karen Moss0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Chodkowski / Karen Dunbar vs Shelley Marcus / Kim McCartney6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Sonia Williams-cole / Linda Revis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-01vs SpringWinner/UTC-ShotwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Colfer / Suzanne Rich vs Katina Colbert / Amy Daltrui3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rinne / Renee Chodkowski vs Cynthia Sabatino / Denise Weisinger4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMarie Perico / Donna Douglass vs Ana Monahan / Jane Zito3-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs Seminole Lakes - MayerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTeresa Regelmann / Karen Dunbar vs Charlotte Hartman / Karen Corliss6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Douglass / Tina Owenby vs Martha Gadowry / Tina McAtee2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-11vs Babcock National - RevisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Jennifer Rinne vs Sharon McCaw / Karen Moss6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRenee Chodkowski / Catherine Colfer vs Shelley Marcus / Kim McCartney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Marinell / Christine Brodsky vs Linda Revis / Sonia Williams-cole6-7, 4-6
2026-05-04vs SpringWinner/UTC-ShotwellLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Catherine Colfer vs Michelle Koeppel / Denise Weisinger7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rinne / Christine Brodsky vs Sheri Coleman / Amy Daltrui2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Marie Perico vs Sherri Campbell / Kim Shotwell3-6, 2-6
2026-04-27vs Seminole Lakes - MayerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Jennifer Rinne vs Jane Kerstetter / Charlotte Hartman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRenee Chodkowski / Teresa Regelmann vs Petra Klos / Teresa Mayer6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Colfer / Tina Owenby vs Cheryl Domingo / Karen Corliss1-6, 2-6
2026-04-20vs Babcock National - RevisWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Colfer / Jennifer Rinne vs Samantha Edwards / Karen Moss6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRenee Chodkowski / Lisa DeLauder vs Julie LeVan / Shelley Marcus6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Marinell / Marie Perico vs Kim McCartney / Linda Revis6-1, 7-6
2026-04-13vs SpringWinner/UTC-ShotwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Colfer / Jennifer Rinne vs Michelle Koeppel / Kim Shotwell2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Karen Dunbar vs Cynthia Sabatino / Denise Weisinger4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLisa DeLauder / Donna Douglass vs Patricia Duquette / Amy Daltrui3-6, 1-6
2026-04-06vs Seminole Lakes - MayerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Karen Dunbar vs Petra Klos / Edie Schwenck2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Regelmann / Amy Marinell vs Lori Davila / Tina McAtee6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Renee Chodkowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Amy Marinell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Donna Douglass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Catherine Colfer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa DeLauder
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Christine Brodsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ginny Asgeirsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Rinne
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Karen Dunbar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathie Karp
published
Kimberly Harrsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marie Perico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Rich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Regelmann
published
Tina Owenby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Karp + Ginny Asgeirsson4255% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dunbar + Christine Brodsky2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Chodkowski
123W–81L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Amy Marinell
96W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Donna Douglass
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Catherine Colfer
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Lisa DeLauder
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Christine Brodsky
23W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Rinne
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathie Karp
66W–71L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Harrsch
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marie Perico
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Rich
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Owenby
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.