Teams

BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Tammi Hodsdon
published
3.85
Amy Yang
published 4
3.71
Lual Lualhati
published
3.70
Janie McCauley
published
3.66
Belinda Buchanan
published 3.5
3.62
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.57
Keri Smith
published
3.46
Laurie Mak
published
3.45
Anne McCormick
published 3.5
3.44
Megan Grunat
published
3.41
Toni Li
published
3.36
Julie Borjon
published 3.5
3.33
Connie J Chang
published 3.5
3.33
Petra Ahvenainen
published
3.23
Cindy Mark
published 3.5
3.16
Pearl Leung
published
3.15
Karen de Martini
published
3.10
Wendy Greer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Greer + Connie J Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Tuesdai Powers + Lual Lualhati213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammi Hodsdon
27W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Amy Yang
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Lual Lualhati
28W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
Janie McCauley
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Belinda Buchanan
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.66
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Keri Smith
37W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Laurie Mak
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Anne McCormick
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Megan Grunat
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.44
Toni Li
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Connie J Chang
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
Petra Ahvenainen
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Mark
15W–26L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Pearl Leung
38W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
Karen de Martini
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.