Teams

State College - Tien

Northern Tier - 18 & Over Adults · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-08vs State College - HuttonLost 04
L#1 DoublesCraig Newschaffer / Chad Fuller vs Michael Hromchak / Brian Rowan2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMakoto Iwasa vs Alex Fratti4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Seidler / Andrew Whyte vs Peter Butler / Blake Gall3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKevin Fiorenzo vs Jonathan Dexter7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-24vs State College - HuttonLost 03
L#1 SinglesJoe Garcia vs Thomas Gaudin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Shaffer / Andy Mowery vs James Hunt / Tarkeshwar Singh3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDayvon Addison vs Brian Rowan1-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Altoona - DuffieWon 30
W#1 DoublesRich Santillo / Luke Marrinan vs Justin Mauk / Raymond Mcmullen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPETER ILIEV vs Jeremy Byers6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDayvon Addison vs Bill Kibler6-2, 6-2
2025-06-03vs Altoona - DuffieWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Fiorenzo / Andrew Whyte vs Bill Kibler / Raymond Mcmullen6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLuke Marrinan vs Jason Hinkledire6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCraig Newschaffer vs Jeremy Byers7-5, 6-4
2025-05-29vs Altoona - DuffieWon 31
L#1 DoublesRich Santillo / James Seidler vs Nicholas Governatori / Jeff Livermore0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDayvon Addison vs Justin Mauk6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Whyte / Geoffrey Field vs Raymond Mcmullen / Jeremy Byers6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJoe Garcia vs Bill Kibler6-1, 6-1
2025-05-27vs State College - HuttonLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Field / PETER ILIEV vs Alex Fratti / Jon Schwantes4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJames Seidler vs Daniel Park0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRich Santillo / Mark Miyamoto vs James Hunt / Michael Hromchak4-6, 1-6
2025-05-17vs State College - HuttonLost 04
L#1 DoublesDayvon Addison / Andy Mowery vs Brian Rowan / Jon Schwantes4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Marrinan vs Daniel Park2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Fiorenzo / James Seidler vs Tarkeshwar Singh / James Hunt4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCraig Newschaffer vs Logan Hutton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1State College - Tien07121632227
2Altoona - Duffie0742448292
3State College - Hutton0828412164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Geoffrey Field
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Dayvon Addison
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Craig Newschaffer
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Rich Santillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Kevin Fiorenzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Andy Mowery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.97
Andrew Whyte
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
James Seidler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Joe Garcia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Luke Marrinan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Makoto Iwasa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mark Miyamoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ming Tien
published
PETER ILIEV
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Fiorenzo + Geoffrey Field4159% games+6.7% vs expected
Mark Miyamoto + Dayvon Addison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Geoffrey Field
22W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Dayvon Addison
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Craig Newschaffer
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Rich Santillo
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.25
Kevin Fiorenzo
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Andy Mowery
16W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Andrew Whyte
10W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
James Seidler
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Garcia
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Marrinan
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Makoto Iwasa
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Miyamoto
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matt Shaffer
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ming Tien
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
PETER ILIEV
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.