Teams

3pete 65+ 8.0

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-11vs Southerland 65+ 8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesJacob Zylberberg / Dennis Weikel vs David Burnell / Howard Staley6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHarold Levy / Joseph Touzin vs Daniel Mandl / Lothar Kranefeld6-0, 6-4
2023-08-07vs Team Schneider 65+ 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoseph Touzin / Steve McCoy vs Horace Robinson / William Bloomquist6-0, 6-4
2023-07-27vs Southerland 65+ 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJacob Zylberberg / Dennis Weikel vs David Porter / Daniel Mandl6-1, 6-3
2023-07-11vs Team Schneider 65+ 8.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesKenneth Dauses / Dennis Weikel vs Clayt Lemme / Horace Robinson6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Theis / Cliff Bernstein vs Steve Newcomer / James Murduck6-4, 6-1
2023-07-07vs Southerland 65+ 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesHarold Levy / Cliff Bernstein vs Randall Scott / Tom Somers6-3, 7-5
2023-06-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesCliff Bernstein / Steve McCoy vs Jay Miller / Thomas Sperling6-4, 6-4
2023-05-23vs Team Schneider 65+ 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesCliff Bernstein / Barry Grube vs Steve Newcomer / Gary Gladden7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Eric Bass
published
3.73
Samuel Hughes
published
3.55
Dennis Weikel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Steve McCoy
published
3.42
Cliff Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Joseph Touzin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kenneth Dauses
published
Jacob Zylberberg
published
John Theis
published
Michael Kane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Bass + Cliff Bernstein303 matchesnot enough data
Cliff Bernstein + Joseph Touzin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Bass
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Samuel Hughes
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.73
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Steve McCoy
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Cliff Bernstein
109W–34L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Joseph Touzin
37W–12L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.38
Kenneth Dauses
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Jacob Zylberberg
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Theis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kane
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.