Teams

HCC Stinson

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Amery Whitby
published 4
3.65
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.50
Kandace McGinnis
published
3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.49
Janine Hoffer
published
3.40
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.27
ANJA BAUGH
published 3.5
3.27
Susan Poulos
published
3.26
Virginia Berents
published
3.23
Sarah Martin
published
3.10
Amy Click
published 3.5
3.07
Sharon Mugford
published
2.79
Elizabeth Betz
published
Joyce Lee
published
Krysten Bishop
published
Vanessa Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Stinson + Sarah Martin6265% games+11.9% vs expected
Virginia Berents + Sharon Mugford3355% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amery Whitby
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Kandace McGinnis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Janine Hoffer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Brittany Nichols
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
ANJA BAUGH
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Susan Poulos
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Virginia Berents
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Sarah Martin
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Amy Click
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sharon Mugford
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Elizabeth Betz
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Joyce Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vanessa Jones
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.