Teams

Yadkin/Lowman-Rike-40+6.5 Day

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Women 6.5 - Friday Morning

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-03vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Jennifer Ayers vs Elizabeth Hollan / Jennifer Baker1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Lowman / Katelyn Chapman vs Mary Reid / Sarah Dalena7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmber Trbonja / Victoria Boysen vs Gaines Douglas / Brooke McChesney1-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Victoria Boysen vs Katie Thompson / Walker Jones5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmber Trbonja / Alissa Williams vs Brooke McChesney / Elizabeth Hollan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Chapman / Linda Lowman vs Brandi Jacques / Whitley Sheffield6-1, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Amy Backus vs Gaines Douglas / Jennifer Baker2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Rike / Jennifer Ayers vs Sara Cannon / Nikki Francis3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmber Trbonja / Katelyn Chapman vs Katie Thompson / Sarah Dalena7-5, 7-6
2025-09-12vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Katelyn Chapman vs Gaines Douglas / Betsy Harris7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Lowman / Carol Parker vs Sara Cannon / Nikki Francis5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Amy Backus vs Brandi Jacques / Natalie Jennings6-1, 6-0
2025-09-05vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Lowman / Amy Backus vs Brandi Jacques / Whitley Sheffield3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDanielle Wright / Jennifer Ayers vs Jennifer Bryan / Brooke McChesney6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlissa Williams / Carol Parker vs Mary Reid / Sarah Dalena1-6, 0-6
2025-08-29vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Chapman / Amber Trbonja vs Whitley Sheffield / Gaines Douglas4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlissa Williams / Carol Parker vs Betsy Harris / Katie Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Lowman / Victoria Boysen vs Walker Jones / Sara Cannon3-6, 1-6
2025-08-22vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Amy Backus vs Walker Jones / Brandi Jacques2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Rike / Alissa Williams vs Mary Reid / Brooke McChesney2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Wright / Jennifer Ayers vs Elizabeth Hollan / Jennifer Baker6-1, 7-5
2025-08-15vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Katelyn Chapman vs Gaines Douglas / Betsy Harris7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Lowman / Amy Backus vs Mary Reid / Nikki Francis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Victoria Boysen vs Sara Cannon / Natalie Jennings6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 - Friday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Amy Backus
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Linda Lowman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.12
Kelly Rike
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.11
Amber Trbonja
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.89
Jennifer Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Alissa Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Victoria Boysen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Carol Parker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lowman + Amy Backus131351% games−2.0% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Amber Trbonja1733% games−4.5% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Rebecca Hartsough224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rike + Rebecca Hartsough134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Hartsough + Amy Backus134 matchesnot enough data
Amber Trbonja + Amy Backus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Amy Backus
32W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kelly Rike
8W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amber Trbonja
11W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Alissa Williams
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Victoria Boysen
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carol Parker
23W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.