Teams

Parmentier/Hunter

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-20vs Moore/RR/NCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesLori Hunter / Shanon Patterson vs Claire Showmaker / Patty James6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHelen Pennington vs Layna Moore6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSherry Missildine / Krystal Scott vs Ashley Arnold / Karrah Dickeson5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHye Kang vs Danielle Patterson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie Sikorski / Traci Gatlin vs Megan Pippin / Katie Peek2-6, 2-6
2025-05-13vs Moore/RR/NCCLost 23
W#1 DoublesLori Hunter / Shanon Patterson vs Katie Peek / Megan Pippin6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHelen Pennington vs Patty James6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKara Daniel / Lisa Henry vs Danielle Patterson / Layna Moore3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesManjula Carter vs Ashley Arnold0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Sikorski / Traci Gatlin vs Karrah Dickeson / Megan Schroeder6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-04vs Moore/RR/NCCLost 23
W#1 DoublesLori Hunter / Shanon Patterson vs Claire Showmaker / Patty James7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHelen Pennington vs Katie Peek6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Sikorski / Traci Gatlin vs Danielle Patterson / Megan Pippin3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesManjula Carter vs Ashley Arnold6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKara Daniel / Lisa Henry vs Layna Moore / Megan Schroeder6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Moore/RR/NCCLost 23
L#1 DoublesKrystal Scott / Sherry Missildine vs Megan Pippin / Katie Peek2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAngie Sikorski vs Patty James3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Pennington / Shanon Patterson vs Layna Moore / Danielle Patterson7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHye Kang vs Claire Showmaker6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKara Daniel / Lisa Henry vs Ashley Arnold / Karrah Dickeson3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Helen Pennington
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Krystal Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Lori Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Traci Gatlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Angie Sikorski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Hye Kang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kara Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Henry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Manjula Carter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Shanon Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sherry Missildine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Sikorski + Traci Gatlin044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Henry + Kara Daniel033 matchesnot enough data
Lori Hunter + Shanon Patterson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Helen Pennington
8W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
Krystal Scott
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lori Hunter
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Traci Gatlin
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Angie Sikorski
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Hye Kang
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Daniel
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Henry
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manjula Carter
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shanon Patterson
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Missildine
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.