Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Bracken

2022 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.0M

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-08vs Sports Mall-NelsonLost 13
W#1 DoublesThomas Good / Justin Bracken vs Kris Denos / Sean Picou6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDali Licul vs Ryan Farr7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNick Rowe / Jack Pendergast vs Cameron Colligan / Scott Fuhriman2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRick Cromar / Travis Charbonneau vs Reed Reinhold / Jacob Jaskierny3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-Keller/VisserSplit 22
W#1 DoublesThomas Good / Nick Rowe vs REX HEYNS / Mikael Johnson6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEddie Fung vs Andrew Keller2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTravis Charbonneau / Rick Cromar vs Baodong Liu / Tim Bacheller7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJack Pendergast / Brent Higgs vs Endhi Visser / Michael Fordham1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-17vs Liberty Park Tennis-BalchWon 31
W#1 DoublesThomas Good / Chase Hauver vs Alfred Balch / Jeff Neuberger6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJustin Bracken vs Chris Porter6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEddie Fung / Nick Rowe vs John Leggett / Timothy Jeffryes6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDali Licul / Rick Cromar vs Glenn Bailey / Larry Richie6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-14vs Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/FolletteSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEddie Fung / Justin Bracken vs Collin Begley / Ben Jones6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesThomas Good vs David Blake6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDali Licul / Nick Rowe vs Mark Follette / Greg Ostrander3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRick Cromar / Jack Pendergast vs Paul Moxley / Andrew Lovegrove1-6, 2-6
2022-09-10vs South Jordan-ChristensenWon 20
W#1 DoublesJustin Bracken / Thomas Good vs Manoj Gangwar / Dennis Seiler6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDali Licul / Nick Rowe vs Tanner Brown / Jonathan Luevano-Gonzalez7-6, 6-3
2022-09-03vs Sports Mall-Bachman/RozsaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Bracken / Travis Charbonneau vs Dean Bachman / Ronald Zimmerman2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEddie Fung vs Brahiam Patino1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDali Licul / Jack Pendergast vs Don McBroom / Arasu Gopinath4-6, 3-6
2022-08-27vs Cottonwood Club-Arico/RuprechtLost 13
W#1 DoublesThomas Good / Tanner Jensen vs Dave Ruprecht / Nic Bryson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEddie Fung vs Tim Nielsen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJared Gonzalez / Travis Charbonneau vs Joseph Arico / Shawn Hazen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRick Cromar / Jack Pendergast vs Howard Davis / Karl Kieffer1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Thomas Good
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Chase Hauver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Nick Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Dali Licul
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Jack Pendergast
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Eddie Fung
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.46
Rick Cromar
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Brent Higgs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Justin Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Travis Charbonneau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chase Hauver + Justin Bracken6077% gamesnot enough data
Nick Rowe + Thomas Good5169% gamesnot enough data
Brent Higgs + Jack Pendergast123 matchesnot enough data
Brent Higgs + Eddie Fung123 matchesnot enough data
Nick Rowe + Dali Licul213 matchesnot enough data
Rick Cromar + Jack Pendergast033 matchesnot enough data
Justin Bracken + Thomas Good303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Good
61W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Chase Hauver
27W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nick Rowe
50W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Dali Licul
64W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Jack Pendergast
36W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Eddie Fung
68W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Rick Cromar
27W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Brent Higgs
31W–116L career · 1 line in 2022
0%84%16%
2.37
Justin Bracken
24W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Travis Charbonneau
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.